As many of you have noticed, not only am I pro crime, but I'm also pro terrorist. Of-course, since I am a very very fair person, I'm also pro shooting and stabbing criminals and terrorists, so you could just say I'm pro entertainment. You'd be wrong. I'm pro crime and pro shooting criminals.
I found this in the comments of another hilarious IMAO:

We all know about the negatives of terrorism, but we rarely here about the positives.

The benefits of terrorism:
- Economy helped by increased sales of gas masks, batteries, coffins

- Tax payers finally get value for money from weapons that would otherwise go un-used.

- Helps protect tradition by bringing back Holy Wars that everyone had forgotten about

- Creates exciting games of international hide-and-seek (good for otherwise-unemployed bounty hunters)

- Television suddenly becomes informative and entertaining

- Encourages creative thinking amongst Muslim clerics and left-wing academics in concocting Jewish conspiracy theories

- Allows washed-up stars like Bruce Springstein to win grammies they otherwise wouldn't win.

- Provide young middle-eastern kids with quality combat education

Since I am very fair, I don't support peace in the middle east in any way, shape, or form. Peace would be fundamentally unfair to both sides. I think people who are stupid enough to fight over rocks and pieces of desert and religion, deserve exactly what they have now. If I was the Israelis, I would just move the fuck out and then nuke the whole area. Just invade Syria and call it New Israel. If I was the Palestinians, I would just start kidnapping and eating Israelis. It's much better then telling your children to explode. The whole exploding thing is sick-cool. This is what happens when you let Palestinian parents and their dictators (Arafat) watch western cartoons like Tom and Jerry all day and play violent video games. Its not the children we have to worry about, its the parents.

For those of you that didn't believe the above link, Arafat's love of Cartoons is well documented, and it is well known that Arafat's strategy against the Jews is based on Tom and Jerry.

Speaking of equal treatment of idiots and being fair, I read an interview today that talked about the "Fairness Doctrine" and how the media had to give equal time to idiots on both side of the issue. Here is an excerpt:

John Hawkins: Let me ask you another radio related question. If the Fairness Doctrine were implemented again as so many on the left want, what would it do to talk radio?

Michael Medved: It would destroy it. The problem with the Fairness Doctrine is not that it insures balance, there's nothing wrong with balance, it's that it insures less political conversation. In other words, if people knew they had to balance a very successful broadcast of the Michael Medved show with some new liberal show that might or might not succeed, that makes my show a much less attractive investment.

John Hawkins: Because they'd have to give three hours to a show that's not going to make money like your show does.

Michael Medved: Exactly. If you're going to be regulated in terms of content, why mess with political content? You can just go with Tom Leykis, with shock talk, sort of FM talk, or sort of the bland, non-controversial, a little bit of this, a little bit of that type of show.

But the striking thing about talk radio today is not that there is more conservative talk, but that there is more political talk. This entire format did not exist at one point. Basically, the Fairness Doctrine has always had and would have again a chilling impact on that kind of public dialogue.

Then he goes exploding from his rocker and starts saying that communists should oppress themselves:

John Hawkins: Speaking of that, in your opinion, what would it take to solve the Israeli/Palestinian conflict within let's say a decade or so, if it's solvable?

Michael Medved: A total reformation of Palestinian society and a much more firm assertion of leadership from those sane voices that do exist within the Palestinian madness. People are right about this, that basically what is going to be necessary is something like a Palestinian civil war. The truth about Hamas and Islamic Jihad is that they don't prevent Israel from existing or even flourishing, they prevent Palestine from coming into existence. The only way a Palestinian state will ever exist is if those terrorist structures are dismantled, even if they will never be entirely eliminated. I don't think America will ever totally wipe out Al-Qaeda, but that doesn't mean we don't have to do our best to degrade their ability to harm us.

One of the things that I think is the absolute crucial focus for any peace in the Middle East, is the figure of a Palestinian cop. Cops are good people, it's one of the lessons that I learned many years that helped make me a conservative. Cops are on the side of civilization. Even troubled and unhappy cops exist to try to make normal, peaceful life possible. It's one of the reasons I think Israel went along in Oslo with the creation of these paramilitary forces. It's because they recognized that if you have enough Palestinian cops, it becomes their job to work with the forces of civilization on the Israeli side. That's truly is what's necessary. The emergence of Palestinian cops will facilitate the removal of Israeli soldiers who do not want to be there anyway.

Oh yeah, let the Palestinians oppress themselves with kkkops. Who would explode Jewish babies if the palestonions were oppressed? This is unfair to the jewish babies. This Medved guy needs to stop taking this "Fairness doctrine" so seriously. Well at least he clarifies that he is against independent voting later in the interview:

[Talking about Libertarians] The reason I enjoy talking to these guys on the air is because they are so utterly incapable of answering the question, "Ok, what have you accomplished with all of your activism?" The answer is absolutely nothing except electing a bunch of ultra-liberal Democrats and big government types like Maria Cantwell. Our Senator from Washington state, Maria Cantwell, would not be in office were it not for the "Losertarians". She beat Slade Gorton by less than 3000 votes and the "Losertarian" candidate got 66,000 votes. That kind of outcome is sad and appalling and it's unfair to decent people who work seriously in politics.

I do think it's very telling that the "Losertarians" have all decided to have a mass migration to New Hampshire to try to takeover that state. Good luck to them and I think that's a much more useful way to use their time than trying to run morons for President.

Pretty funny, actually.
-posted by Bad Commie @ 5:07 PM