Bad Commie!

helping commies get to know knives

My favorite stabbings:
God, Mother Earth, W, Prayer, Poetry, Uptight Nervous Canadian Frostbacks, Debating,
Self Stabbing, Ann Coulter, The Ketchup Prince, Gay Marriage, Fantasy

Monday, December 22, 2003
Was Osama bin Texan wrong about the republicrats being commies? Star Parker says that:

America has two economic systems: capitalism for the rich and socialism for the poor. This double-minded approach seems to keep the poor enslaved to poverty while the rich get richer. Let's face it, despite its $400 billion price tag, welfare isn't working.

The solution is a faith-based, not state-sponsored, plan. In Uncle Sam's Plantation, she offers five simple yet profound steps that will allow the nation's poor to go from entitlement and slavery to empowerment and freedom. Parker shares her own amazing journey up from the lower rungs of the economic system and addresses the importance of extending the free market system to this neglected group of people. Emphasizing personal initiative, faith, and responsibility, she walks readers toward releasing the hold poverty has over their lives.

So, poor people are commies, while rich people are capitalist pig dogs? What's in it for me to debunk this terrorist lie?

Lets have a go:

The Poor

Receive stolen money (the only kind of money the government has) from the government.
Some are addicted to money gotten without working, some are not.

Relationship with government: Short term beneficiaries of Communism (government is communism).

State Transitions:
Hard working immigrants (not socialist trash) sometimes transition to being rich.
Stupid rich people become poor.

The Rich

Have their money stolen by the government.
All are addicted to money gotten without working.

Relationship with government: Long and Short Term victims of Communism

State Transitions:
Stupid rich people become poor.
Hard working immigrants sometimes transition to being rich.

So, looking at this ecosystem, people who are genetically or culturally disposed to be lazy and stupid end up poor. People who do not have both of those traits are distributed among both groups.
People who are both hard working and smart are rich.

In so far as the democratic or republican party chooses to represent the non changing pool of lazy stupid, they are a communist party.
In so far as the democratic or republican party chooses to represent the non changing pool of hardworking smart, they are a capitalist party.

Stable States:
A) The party that chooses to represent the poor politically benefits from people undergoing the rich -> poor transition and also benefits from people not being able to take the poor->rich transition. This would be the communist party.

B) The party that chooses to represent the rich politically benefits from the poor->rich transition and is harmed by the rich->poor transition. This would be the capitalist party.

Parties that attempt to intially straddle the two pools(rich and poor) and attempt to straddle the 2 state transitions between the pools will naturally evolve towards one of the party stable states(A,B) described above.

Take That Osama Bin Texan!
In a two party system, both parties can't be commies! I just proved it with teh anti commie math.
Now, which party is which?....

On other news, The Commie Onion reports that:

Communists Now Least Threatening Group In U.S.
WASHINGTON, DC—According to a report released Tuesday by the Pentagon, Communists rank last on a list of 238 threats to national security. "Communists may now safely be ignored," Secretary of Defense William Cohen said. "The Red Menace has been surpassed by militia groups, religious extremists, ecoterrorists, cybercriminals, Hollywood producers, and angry drivers." Other groups deemed more threatening than Communists include rap-metal bands (#96), escaped zoo animals (#202), and Belgians (#237).

I just stabbed all the onions in my fridge. It is the onions that are crying now!

This is almost as bad humor as Gandalf the Unilateral by the Politburo:

His illegal, immoral invasion of Mordor was typical. He is "all hat and no magic," so arrogant riding on big white horse. Who he think he is? Never bothered to get authorization from White Council for his war on Mordor.* Never even tried to get Sarumance on board. And Sarumance ended up vetoing his plan at the White Council.

Comments: Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger