STAB FRENCHMAN JOHN KERRY, STAB TRIAL LAWYER JOHN EDWARDS, STAB ANGRY DWARF HOWARD DEAN, STAB HOLY COMMIE DENNIS KUCINICH, STAB STATIST COMMIE GEORGE W BUSH, STAB, STAB, STAB,
What's that, I have to write a blog entry? Oh, all right.

Given how nasty some if the bush flash links were, that I posted in the previous blogs, here is a very nice one: Time to Bomb Saddam. It makes me very happy and cheers me up every time I watch it! Give it a stab! You'll love it! This one is also pretty good, so is this one. This one is just OK.


Today, I'll start with an explanation of why sweatshops are good, in order to make sure commies don't read my blog:

Contrast those nations to the countries that have traditionally been "spared" sweatshops: the results are striking.

India, for example, has long resisted allowing itself to be "exploited" by foreign investment. It was one of the last major countries in the world to be introduced to Coca-Cola. Consequently, India festered in abject poverty for decades. India has only opened its markets to the west in the latter part of the last century and, as Norberg writes, its economy immediately showed signs of life. India's percentage of child laborers in the workforce has fallen from 35% to just 12%.

The economist and syndicated columnist Thomas Sowell describes how anti-sweatshop sentiments in the 1950s hindered progress in West Africa:

Half a century ago, public opinion in Britain caused British firms in colonial West Africa to pay higher wages than local economic conditions would have warranted. Net result? Vastly more job applicants than jobs.

Not only did great numbers of frustrated Africans not get jobs. They did not get the work experience that would have allowed them to upgrade their skills and become more valuable and higher-paid workers later on.

Today, of course, western and sub-Saharan Africa are among the most destitute regions on earth. Per capita GDP there is actually lower today than it was in the 1960s.

But even within that desolation, there flicker feint glimmers of hope. Norberg writes that a few countries - Botswana, Ghana, and most notably Uganda - have liberalized their trade policies in recent years and have already seen double-digit decreases in poverty rates. One wonders what might have happened if well-intentioned public opinion in 1950s Britain could have stomached the short-term discomfort of early industrialization in Africa for the long term benefits of modernized economies. Today's Africa may have been much, much different.

Ok, now that all the commies have been chased away by the truth, we can get down to bidness.

Here is an excellent article from FrontPage Magazine by Alexis Amory describing how BBC == Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation:

Now, the BBC's heavy-handed instant self-abasement to the Islamofascists and their apologists is doubly hypocritical, because there is a British Oxford-based poet, lecturer and attention-seeker by the name of Tom Paulin who appears regularly as a panelist on the BBC.

In contrast to the mild Kilroy-Silk, Mr Paulin has indeed freely incited violence. A pick n mix selection of Paulin's comments made during an interview with the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram last April: "Brooklyn-born" Jewish settlers on the West Bank "should be shot dead"; "they are Nazis"; "I feel nothing but hatred for them". A few days after his violent views were published, Mr.Paulin's script was acted out as a Hamas Death Squad shot dead four Israeli settlers in their beds, including a five year-old girl.

I am not saying it was cause and effect. And I am not saying that Mr Paulin is anti-Semitic as opposed to anti-Israel. I am, however, saying that his words were an incontrovertible incitement to hatred and violence. Yet, while Kilroy-Silk was scraped off the air with indecent haste for an article in a British newspaper, Paulin continues his regular appearance on the BBC's The Late Review, his wrist not even lightly tapped for comments he made to an Arab newspaper. Nor does Trevor Phillips have any words of admonishment for him.


Pravda BBC! STAB! OK, so stabbing the BBC is like stabbing swiss cheese, why would one even bother? Everyone knows the BBC are hard core cheese eating, freedom hating, censoring communists who would immediately get crushed by capitalist media in a free market and run crying home to nana. "Good" thing their broadcasting monopoly is supported by the state, huh?

If you want real reporting you have to listen to people like this:

They called my reporting "hard-hitting," "a public service." I won 18 Emmys, and lots of other journalism awards. One year I got so many Emmys, another winner thanked me in his acceptance speech "for not having an entry in this category."

Then I did a terrible thing. Instead of just applying my skepticism to business, I applied it to government and "public interest" groups. This apparently violated a religious tenet of journalism. Suddenly I was no longer "objective."

Ralph Nader said I "used to be on the cutting edge," but had become "lazy and dishonest." According to Brill's Content, "Nader was a fan during Stossel's consumer advocate days," but "now talks about him as if he'd been afflicted with a mysterious disease."

These days, I rarely get awards from my peers. Some of my ABC colleagues look away when they see me in the halls. Web sites call my reporting "hurtful, biased, absurd." "What happened to Stossel?" they ask. CNN invited me to be a guest on a journalism show; when I arrived at the studio, I discovered they'd titled it "Objectivity and Journalism #151; Does John Stossel Practice Either?" People now e-mail me, calling me "a corporate whore" and a "sellout."

Speaking of terrified commies, why are the democrats not complaining about the gross fraud and stalinism in their primary elections? Much Much worse than anything that happened in Florida:

On caucus night, the Iowa Democratic Party will release the delegate count. Here's when the party will release the raw vote count and the realigned vote count: Never. The party won't compile or even record them, except as a temporary step in most precincts so that the caucus chair can determine how many delegates each candidate gets. The party doesn't want raw votes compiled and released, because it wants the caucuses to be a collaborative activity, not a tally of individual preferences. That's all well and good, if you like the party's communitarian version of democracy. But if you want to know how many voters stood up for John Edwards, you're out of luck.

Well, we all know why the democrats don't want a fair process. Because they are GODLESS COMMIES with too much "socialist vision", that's why.

GODLESS COMMIES who:

....
have grandly quoted from the Book of Proverbs: "Where there is no vision, the people perish." The biblical invocation plays into the media-fed notion that great leaders succeed when they persevere according to their own lights.

But such popularized concepts of political leadership -- encouraged by countless journalists -- are long on vision and short on hearing. With apparent self-assurance, politicians often have a way of filtering out the messages they don't want to hear, even from their own supporters.

I think we need more Jacksonian doers and less Jeffersonian talkers:

One way to grasp the difference between the two schools is to see that both Jeffersonians and Jacksonians are civil libertarians, passionately attached to the Constitution and especially to the Bill of Rights, and deeply concerned to preserve the liberties of ordinary Americans. But while the Jeffersonians are most profoundly devoted to the First Amendment, protecting the freedom of speech and prohibiting a federal establishment of religion, Jacksonians see the Second Amendment, the right to bear arms, as the citadel of liberty. Jeffersonians join the American Civil Liberties Union; Jacksonians join the National Rifle Association. In so doing, both are convinced that they are standing at the barricades of freedom.

And finally, here is an idiot commie from California saying Texas doesn't know how to be capitalist. That would be CALIFORNIA. CASE CLOSED.

Anyway, back to the stabbing!

COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB

P.S. Osama bin Texan [name in Evil Texan Commie Red] wanted me to include a link to some positive examples of capitalism. Here is one about Joe Martin and Sherline Products.

COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB, COMMIE -> STAB

-posted by Bad Commie @ 11:19 PM