Bad Commie!

helping commies get to know knives

My favorite stabbings:
God, Mother Earth, W, Prayer, Poetry, Uptight Nervous Canadian Frostbacks, Debating,
Self Stabbing, Ann Coulter, The Ketchup Prince, Gay Marriage, Fantasy

Saturday, May 15, 2004

Starting this week and lasting into June, billions and possibly even trillions of cicadas will emerge across much of the eastern half of the United States.
The thumb-sized insects are democrats, but they are large, noisy and clumsy. They climb out of their underground homes en masse after 17 years of slow development with only one goal in mind -- stealing the money of hard working capitalists
The last time this happened at such a scale was in 1987, and Baker was working in the emergency room of Cincinnati Children's.

Thankfully, a heroic little bad commie stabber is on the job:

"We had a stab wound to the arm from a kid who was trying to kill a cicada on the arm of another child but unfortunately he was using a knife," Baker added.

God DAMN Commie Cicadas.

The filthy democrat nazi raper racists are at it again. Even the ultra left wing liberal Wall Street Journal can't deny it this time:

The Globe found itself in a kerfuffle over a photo it ran with yesterday's story, which showed Kambon and Turner displaying the photos at the press conference. (That photo--which as you might expect is somewhat graphic--is reproduced at the Drudge Report.) Today the Globe ran the following "editor's note":

A photograph on Page B2 yesterday did not meet Globe standards for publication. The photo portrayed Boston City Councilor Chuck Turner and activist Sadiki Kambon displaying graphic photographs that they claimed showed US soldiers raping Iraqi women. Although the photograph was reduced in size between editions to obscure visibility of the images on display, at no time did the photograph meet Globe standards. Images contained in the photograph were overly graphic, and the purported abuse portrayed had not been authenticated [It has been disproved as pornographic entertainment, not "not authenticated", you anti-american wholly owned subsidiary of the New York Times]. The Globe apologizes for publishing the photo.

Kennedy argues that the story the photos accompanied "is completely legitimate, making it clear that there was no way of authenticating the photos . . . and even raising the possibility that it was all an Internet fraud--as it indeed turned out to be."

We're not so sure we'd agree with the defense of the story. Turner and Kambon are racist crackpots, as Kennedy notes, citing an April Boston Herald report:

Turner was quoted as saying that [Condoleezza] Rice isn't concerned "about the plight of the majority" of African-Americans. Okay, she's a foreign-policy wonk, not a domestic-policy analyst. But then Turner added that Rice is a "tool to white leaders. . . . It's similar in my mind to a Jewish person working for Hitler in the 1930s." Say what?

Kambon, naturally, was even more outrageous, calling her "Condoleezza White Rice" and "The Negro Security Adviser."

The Globe's original story on the porn photos also reports that Kambon "said at the news conference that he received the photographs by e-mail from Akbar Muhammad, a representative for the Nation of Islam."

This is roughly the equivalent of a newspaper skeptically but respectfully reporting on a showing of anti-American propaganda by David Duke, which Duke says he got from the Ku Klux Klan. Such an action by Duke might be newsworthy, but the story would be about an extremist hate-monger peddling lies, not a respected officeholder making a statement that may or may not be true.

At least in communist Mediocre Britain, people get fired for shit like this:

"Objective Reality" of Prisoner Abuse
BBC: Regiment piles pressure on Mirror

The UK newspaper Daily Mirror ran faked photos, allegedly showing British troops abusing prisoners. "The Queen's Lancashire Regiment (QLR) told a press conference the Daily Mirror must apologize for publishing the pictures and endangering British troops."

Piers Morgan, the Daily Mirror editor responsible offered this defense:

Mr Morgan said: "There is, of course, a much bigger issue here that we make no apology for highlighting - which is that the pictures accurately illustrated the reality about the appalling conduct of some British troops."

Da, Comrade Stalin would have been proud. The "objective reality" of prisoner abuse is well-served by running fake photographs. Let us have Purge Trial of QRL, on any evidence. If evidence does not exist, Comrade Morgan will invent it. Khorosho.

Update: Comrade Morgan purged! Capitalist swine at Daily Mirror sack Morgan.

Here is bolshoi ruble quote: "The Mirror had campaigned vigorously against the invasion of Iraq." Understatement of year, da?

Does anyone get lynched for this kind of filthy treason in America? Oh, I forgot, I guess free speech means letting Stalin give the order to kill commies. That stupid nigger racist Chuck Turner needs to go back to France where he is from.

I was watching Fox news in the last couple of days and Fox and friends just had the best ever moment on Fox news on Wednesday morning! They were holding up different newspapers with pictures from the horrible arab snuff film of nick berg, and ED Hill was saying: "Look this paper has a nice big picture of it on the front page, this one and this one and this one." And then she holds up the NYT and it was all anti american propaganda, no mention of the snuff film. Brian says this is why people are upset about the media bias [i.e treason]. Then E.D. holds up that time the NYT printed the 6 month old pics of the "abuse" on the front page taking up the whole page. Wow! What a contrast! Then Brian tries to find the reports of outrage from the arab world. He can't seem to find them so he starts looking under everything on the set. He says "Oh, I'm sure they will be here somewhere". Then he says the NYT editorial page made him throw up. Heh. Very Funny.

Speaking of funny, the economist has a funny article pointing out that all corporations are psychopaths (guess what that makes the worker?):

Although the moviemakers claim ownership of the company-as-psychopath idea, it predates them by a century, and rightfully belongs, in its full form, to Max Weber, the German sociologist. For Weber, the key form of social organization defining the modern age was bureaucracy. Bureaucracies have flourished because their efficient and rational division and application of labour is powerful. But a cost attends this power. As cogs in a larger, purposeful machine, people become alienated from the traditional morals that guide human relationships as they pursue the goal of the collective organization. There is, in Weber's famous phrase, a "parcelling-out of the soul".

For Weber, the greater potential tyranny lay not with the economic bureaucracies of capitalism, but the state bureaucracies of socialism. The psychopathic national socialism of Nazi Germany, communism of Stalinist Soviet rule and fascism of imperial Japan (whose oppressive bureaucratic machinery has survived well into the modern era) surely bear Weber out. Infinitely more powerful than firms and far less accountable for its actions, the modern state has the capacity to behave even in evolved western democracies as a more dangerous psychopath than any corporation can ever hope to become: witness the environmental destruction wreaked by Japan's construction ministry.

The makers of "The Corporation" counter that the state was not the subject of their film. Fair point. But they have done more than produce a thought-provoking account of the firm. Their film also invites its audience to weigh up the benefits of privatisation versus public ownership. It dwells on the familiar problem of the corporate corruption of politics and regulatory agencies that weakens public oversight of privately owned firms charged with delivering public goods. But that is only half the story. The film has nothing to say about the immense damage that can also flow from state ownership. Instead, there is a misty-eyed alignment of the state with the public interest. Run that one past the people of, say, North Korea.

Ah yes, dear leader is a psychopath??? I'm shocked. This is an insult to all psychopaths (i.e. everyone according to democrats)! They need to keep this kind of filth secret while they fornicate with each other in their spider holes. Stupid W doesn't think government should keep secrets and thinks government democratic bureaucracies should be accountable [EXECUTIVE ORDER 13292]:

Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations. (a) In no case shall information be classified in order to:

(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;
(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;
(3) restrain competition; or
(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

Boy is he in for a surprise when the democratic bureaucratic-mob ignores him.

More great Iraqi Abuse Pics here!

Comments: Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger