Bad Commie!

helping commies get to know knives

My favorite stabbings:
God, Mother Earth, W, Prayer, Poetry, Uptight Nervous Canadian Frostbacks, Debating,
Self Stabbing, Ann Coulter, The Ketchup Prince, Gay Marriage, Fantasy

Wednesday, November 26, 2003
Draw your own conclusions:

One of the traditions the Pilgrims had brought with them from England was a practice known as 'farming in common.' Everything they produced was put into a common pool, and the harvest was rationed among them according to need. They had thought 'that the taking away of property, and bringing in community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing,' Bradford recounts. They were wrong. 'For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much imployment that would have been to their benefite and comforte,' Bradford writes. Young, able-bodied men resented working for others without compensation. Incentives were lacking.

After the Pilgrims had endured near-starvation for three winters, Bradford decided to experiment when it came time to plant in the spring of 1623. He set aside a plot of land for each family, that 'they should set corne every man for his owne particular, and in that regard trust to themselves.' The results were nothing short of miraculous. Bradford writes: 'This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corne was planted than other ways would have been by any means the Govr or any other could use, and saved him a great deall of trouble, and gave far better content...Given appropriate incentives, the Pilgrims produced and enjoyed a bountiful harvest in the fall of 1623 and set aside 'a day of thanksgiving' to thank God for their good fortune. ["Pilgrims' Progress, or the Story of Thanksgiving"]

Tuesday, November 25, 2003
My dear readers,


For 12 whole months, nay, maybe even 2 years, I have wasted my life thinking that the communist Bush was right to take out the communist Sadaam.

I have now come to the realization, What do I care if one communist kills another? They are both equally bad.

For 2 years, I have liked republicans, because I thought they were doing the right thing after 9-11, even to the point of pissing off my communist coworkers. However, how could I have ever believed that white male uptight nazis would protect my individual rights? How could I have stooped so low as to believe uptight, order giving, planned state economy communists were on my side? These republicans are lower than dirt. Bah! They would never support the individual rights of anyone. At least the communist democrats say they are going to take your money and promise to give you health care in return. What do the republicans do? They take twice as much of your money, all the while telling you they are not communists. The gall of these hypocrites. Meanwhile, what do the republicans do with this money? They give it to state corporations. Just like in the Soviet Union with its planned economy and 10 year plans. Social Security is a 10 year plan! Medicare is a 10 year plan!. Taxes are a 10 year plan! It is no wonder the Russians were always saying we were just like them, since the US government is such a massive part of the economy. How could I have been so blind, so stupid, so gullible?

At this point you may be wondering how I came to this realization that the republicans are commie scum.

Well, I purchased Ann Coulter's book "Slander" and I was having an OK time reading it. I did find it very suspicious that she didn't say anything about republicans being commies, but, hey, maybe the next book would have been about them?

No, comrades, it would not have been. And do you know why? It is because Ann Coulter is a commie spy!

But, back to my story. So I get all excited about Ann, her being a hot chick and all. I immediately search google for "how to get in Ann Coulter's pants". No results. Damn. So I go on her web site and try to post in the forum. I immediately notice that you have to sign up just to even look at the posts in the forum. This, of-course, immediately raises a red flag. That's right - a communist red flag. Like this one:

I sign up for an account and I post some choice quotes from my blog while asking: "if Ann was so great how come she hasn't changed the mind of a single liberal? And if Joe McCarthy was so great, why didn't he go over to the state department and personally stab some commies, which he knew were there?" Tough, but fair questions. Within 10 minutes I get banned. So, OK, maybe Ann isn't a real republican conservative? Well, I search the communist ezboards for forums with the word "conservative" in the title. I find the most popular one called "American Conservative". I post the same question, also pointing out that:

Re: Is Ann Coulter a no good loud mouthed commie? Oh right, I spend half my day searching up links on the internet on how REAL commies murdered millions of people, and I'm the fraud. What has Ann ever done? All she can do is whine about big bad democrats while this is happening:

"Even conservatives who support tax cuts have begun to note the imbalance. Government spending now totals $20,000 per household, a level not seen since World War II, said Brian Reidl, a federal budget analyst with the Heritage Foundation. Meanwhile, taxes total $17,000 per household."

"Conservatives are so afraid of losing their majority status right now that they feel a need to . . . pass the other side's legislation to prove how moderate they are," Reidl said. "But they're showing an astonishing willingness to spend now and dump all the cost in our children's laps, and an amazing unwillingness to reconcile the size of government with the amount of taxes needed to fund it."

I think I know who the REAL commies are.

I was banned Immediately. Not even the barest shallow pretense of trying to listen to someone who exposed the republican claims of being anti communist as pure 100% grade A bullshit. As soon as their scam no longer works, its censor, oppress, and deny. Fucking republican commies. Why are they walking around unstabbed?

Note how their forum introduction says this:

Welcome to American Conservative. Prepare to engage in lively political debate. All points of view are welcome. Civil discourse is the rule. Please read the forum policies by clicking on the Forum Policies link in the political forum. American Conservative is committed to every person's right of free expression, regardless of political persuasion. CAUTION: Spirited discussion ahead.

Compare this with their banning policy, which says they ban whenever they want.

I guess there is just some speech they can't handle. Like free speech or true speech. I believe their terminology for that is "trolling", which must not be a part of their society. Coincidentally, their society is governed by a document which they pretend to respect. This document purports to celebrate free speech.

My readers. I am proud to have been banned by these nazi communist white male republican assholes.

So this is what happened after the communist spy Ann Coulter seduced me. And do you know what the worst part about this whole thing is? I didn't even get one BJ. Clinton got a BJ! That, my friends, bites.

Stab all republicans! The democrats and republicans are both commies who want to take away your individual rights, but the republicans are even bigger commies because they are hypocrites.

Ann says:

The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.

No, Commie Spy Ann Coulter, it is worse being a republican hypocrite/communist/criminal than being a democrat communist. I just saw that for myself. You republicans are hypocrites and this means you do suck.

My friends, this is a republican taking painkillers to take away the sting of his hypocritic life

And this is a commie, doing the same:

Do you see any difference? No?

Its because there isn't one!!!!

Saturday, November 22, 2003
As Ben, the uptight nervous intellectual republican and former Canadian frostback, turned the corner around the thorn bushes, he heard the sounds of clicking and grinding.
He was immediately struck with a deep sense of foreboding. It was as if he had accidentally made a reference to Ted Kennedy as a fat murdering drunk at the monthly communist party town meeting, and had only now realized it that the weekly train for Siberia left today.
Suddenly, without so much as a manifesto, a vicious hungry communist leaped out from behind a pack of wild yapping french cheese eating poodles and masticated Ben's arm with his sharpened metal teeth.
Ben shrieked in girlish fear and tried to pull his arm out of the commie's mouth with all his might. However, each tooth was a miniature sharpened statue of Stalin, cleverly designed in such a way as to make it impossible to be released from Stalin's deadly hungry metal embrace. With a deep growl, and with the heavy weight of enormous planned economy style satisfaction, the commie bit down harder and harder and the little tooth Stalins completely removed Ben's arm.

Now, Ben was armless, second amendment or not.

The commie, holding Ben's drool covered arm in his mouth, quickly crunched it in two and started sucking out the sweet capitalist marrow as Ben watched on in helpless rage and shock. After sucking on the marrow for about 30 seconds, the commie turned his gaze back upon Ben and started grinding and clicking his vicious hungry commie teeth. Ben blinked, blood dripping, down the remains of his arm, which was as mangled as the US constitution after 200 years of liberal reinterpretation. Some dim profit motive flickered to life within Ben's brain and he turned to run. But the commie was quicker! With a great leap forward, the commie sank his vicious teeth straight into Ben's capitalist ass! Ben fell forward and his head cracked against the poorly maintained pavement like the fragile fabric of society under the weight of communist hypocrisy.

Ben was dead, yet another victim of communism and the poor educational system which failed to teach proper communist killing techniques. Ben had a fatal encounter with hungry commie metal teeth. Ben was erased from history.

My dear readers. This is what happens when you don't stab commies.

Tuesday, November 18, 2003
I notice that the eurotrash are protesting in record numbers to get back their hero Sadaam Hussein. Actually, it mainly seems to be the democrats that are playing this up, because they have a lot at stake in the wonderful activity of making foreigners hate W. The foreign constituency is very important to them getting elected. Evidently, a large number of foreigners vote for democrats in the US election.

I'm not bitter, however. I'm actually going to do something about it.

This is Psalm 23:

The LORD is my shepherd,
I shall not want;

He makes me lie down in green pastures.
He leads me beside still waters;

He restores my soul.
He leads me in paths of righteousness for his name's sake.

Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I fear no evil; for thou art with me;
thy rod and thy staff, they comfort me.

Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of my enemies;
thou anointest my head with oil, my cup overflows.

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life;
and I shall dwell in the house of the LORD for ever.

I've gotten together with God, and we're modernizing this thing:

The LORD is my guide,
my knife shall not waver;

He makes me lie still in green camouflage waiting for commies.
He turns the faucet on, so the commies are distracted and can't hear me;

He sharpens my knife when it is dull.
He stabs 10,000 commies as an example so I know what to do for him.

Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of democrats,
I fear no liberal; for my knife is very very big;
thy knife and thy other knife, they comfort me.

Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of commies;
thou anointest my head with camouflage paint, my knife shop gives me unlimited credit.

Surely dead commies and very sharp knives shall surround me all the days of my life;
and I shall dwell in the house of the LORD, on top of a pile of stabbed commies, for ever.

That's much better. I shall say it every day.

Here is another one that needs updating:

A Prayer Of Victory Over Death

Precious Lord Jesus, Wonderful Holy Spirit, Awesome God,
I love you, Lord Jesus.

Let the final battle of my life be won not by the forces of nature that most assuredly want my body to fail, but may this battle be won by you as I grasp your hand at these last moments.

As I approach the end of this earthly journey, show me the door of your heaven full of so much light, promise, and hope realized.

In your name, and by your power, I proclaim victory over the sting that now seeks to take me down.

In your name, and by your power, I reach out to you in victory over forces of nature that shall take away my earthly life.

Although I can see the dark curtain about to fall down upon me, I can see the full burst of your glory that makes the curtain fade away and fall apart.

As I hear the rumblings of the dark powers that have come to destroy me, in your name, I reach out to you, and in victory we shall travel together across that momentary divide to heaven.

According to your will, when it seems all is lost, show me all is found.
Show me the victory over death.
Touch me so I may carry your light to that final minute.

According to your will, may I be immersed in your light and love at this hour so I shall leave behind me a testimony of faith in you and a testimony of your power over the grave.

All these things I humbly pray in the name of my most Blessed Lord Jesus Christ, my Mighty God, and my Ever-present Holy Spirit upon whom I can rely.


The approved version:

Prayer Of Victory Over the Big Commie Stronghold in Hell

Precious Lord Baby Jesus, Wonderful Holy Vodka Dispenser, Awesome Knifemaker,
I love you, Lord Jesus.

Let the final battle of my life be won, not by the forces of Socialism that most assuredly want my body to fail, but may this battle be won by the heat of my rage as I grasp your blessed knife at these last moments.

As I approach the end of this earthly journey, show me the door of your heaven full of so much light, promise, and hope realized.

In your name, and by your power, I proclaim victory over the sting operation that now seeks to take me to commie central.

In your name, and by your power, I reach out to you in victory over forces of pure socialist evil that shall take away my earthly knife.

Although I can see the dark wave of millions of commies about to overrun me, I can see the full burst of your holy nuclear weapons that makes the curtain fade away and fall apart, as is the fate of all commies.

As I hear the rumblings of the dark powers that have come to destroy me, in your name, I reach out to you, and in victory we shall travel together across that momentary divide to heaven.

According to your will, when it seems all is lost, show me all is found.
Show me the victory over taxes.
Arm me so I may carry your knife to that final minute.

According to your will, may I be immersed in your light and love at this hour so I shall leave behind me piles and piles of dead commies and a testimony of your power over those that seek to enslave others.

All these things I humbly pray in the name of my most Blessed Lord Baby Jesus Christ, my Mighty Capitalist God, and my Ever-present Holy Spirit Knife upon whom I can rely.


My prayers always get answered, but in case you are having trouble getting a satisfactory response to your prayers, here is the reason why God is not answering.

Thursday, November 13, 2003
The time has come to face your deepest darkest fear.

Yes, that's right. The fear that all your property will be taken away by a bigger and stronger man.

Many of you think the liberal myth called the US constitution guarantees your right to private property. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth. To see the hideous writhing depths of this farce we must first reflect....

Firstly, the constitution is a fraud - the piece of paper allowed slavery, did not let women vote (men...), OK'd the extermination of the Indians, is fine with genocidal wars and mass stealing, and is used to support taxes. How much is such a piece of paper really worth? Hmmmm? How can you condone mass murder and communism, and yet be a shining beacon of freedom? It is a shining beacon of minimum wage employment for British wig wearing cross dressers called judges.

And even all those fancy sounding rights that the constitution and its "Bill for your Rights" talks about you having - well, they've all long since gone bye bye, as the readers of this blog know!

Are other constitutionals better? No, not really. The EuroTrash one is a joke that inspires no one. The Russian constitutional of Vodka just makes Russians even more drunk and stupid.
All these stupid constitutionals talk about some kind of communist rights like those advocated by the UN. Here is the truth about UN style rights:

The 18th century concept of individual rights is founded on the opposite and revolutionary idea -- that each individual is an end in himself, with his (or her) life and happiness as the moral purpose. That's what the United States' founding fathers meant by the individual's right to "life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness." These rights, being "unalienable," cannot be abrogated by government decree or majority vote.

Because these rights apply to each individual, nobody's rights can negate anyone else's. Individual rights are not entitlements to food, shelter, health care, money, love, sex, etc., forcibly extracted from others. They are freedoms of action that a rational being requires to choose and achieve the values that his life and happiness require, actions such as creative thought, productive work, voluntary association and free trade. Only such freedoms can yield peaceful coexistence and prosperity.

Individual rights are precisely what the UN's declaration is designed to destroy. No, it doesn't openly attack individual rights; that would be rejected outright by freer countries. It destroys rights by internal corruption -- by perverting the meaning of rights into its exact opposite.

The declaration first covers what appear to be legitimate rights, such as "the right to life, liberty and security of person," "the right to own property," and freedom of "thought" and "opinion." (The right to pursue happiness is absent, for reasons that will soon become obvious.) It then introduces a series of "economic rights," such as a person's "right" to work, paid holidays, protection against unemployment, social security, free education, and a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care .

If people are entitled to these, who will be forced to provide them? Whose property will be seized to pay for them?

Such "economic rights" obviously contradict the right to liberty and property. There can be no such thing as a right to violate the rights of others. "Economic rights" merely hand government the power to violate individual rights, thereby rendering the individual a slave to the needs and desires of others. They effectively make communism the social ideal. (This is made explicit in Article 29, which states: "Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.")

Well, that the UN economic rights are diarrhetic rabid weasel nonsense, is easily understood by everyone. And yet, something is missing.... The circle is incomplete....

Are the rights to own property, to seek freedom, liberty and happiness really freedoms of action? He says that individual rights are not entitlements to property or any other form of happiness. So, the government can make laws taking away all the sources of your happiness, and in doing this, somehow not restrict your freedom? Preposterous! My friends, this is the freedom that Stalin so graciously gave to people who did not salute him quickly enough - the freedom to die in Siberia. Now we know the truth. The constitution that allows slavery and mass murder was not the shining beacon that we all thought it was. It gives you the right to own property, but it allows the government to declare that all property belongs to the government. This is called the right of the government to "Eminent Domain", or as I like to call it, the right to "Steal all your stuff and enslave your ass". Funny, huh? No, I don't think so either.

And yet, there is something more. We must dig deeper. It is no mystery that the British wig wearing cross dressers who created the "Bill for your Rights" got it wrong. Let us go to the source. Let us see what God says. After all, the constitution is moral and ethical crap. Maybe the insertion of God into it can make it a moral useful document for moral and useful people?

God says:


"To steal means, to most men, to take a material thing that belongs to another. In reality, there are many facets to stealing. First, many men steal the dignity and respect that The Holy Trinity must have, that The Beloved Heavenly Queen must have, and that all men must have for the Church of My Choice.

Men belittle the act of stealing, calling it instinct. In reality, men must know that to take anything they do not come by justly, is against My Will. They must be aware that to steal drains them of purity. Tell them, Moses, no man will steal Heaven, for I will stand in Judgment and no man will be allowed Here until reparation is made, whether the stealing be of material things, any part of man, or the manner in which men walk."

My friends, now you know the full truth. God, the all powerful, is a retarded raving lunatic. Nay, I do not mock God, or disbelieve in him. Quite the opposite, I deeply and religiously believe. I believe that the all powerful He is a mentally disturbed drooling mongoloid.

And what about this so called "property"? Well, we already know it all "belongs" to the government, which merely lends it to you. Do you really persist in the fiction that the government sometimes pretends its yours? What a foolish waste...
But even in remote wilderness, far from the tax collectors, property does not exist. Something that you can not control is not yours. Can you control rocks and mountains? Can you control tigers? Can you control international finance? Can you control floods? No, property belongs to the drooling mongoloid God. It is He that controls all those things. They are His.

So if someone should ask you if they can have your property, tell them: "Sure, God's stuff can go wherever God wants it to go". And make it clear that they can have this bullet from God's gun and this hole from God's knife as an extra bonus. For that is what property IS - it is your ability to overcome your enemies.

Wednesday, November 12, 2003
Here is my ode to stabbing all liberals that I done gone wrote:

The button glimmers softly with its deep red light.
The commie shrieks, his eyes are bulging, hands are waving.
His appeals so twisted, that neither wrong nor right
can sway him from his futile scramble to pluck at your delight
Your precious joy, your children's hope, your hard earned cash

A knife comes out of nowhere and stabs the commie good
Making the hole of justice in his body
The commie shrieks, his eyes are bulging, hands are waving
Only this time its because we stabbed him!
With the knife!

The body falls, the lies have stopped, another job is done.
The scales are balanced, harm avoided, dogs are safe from hungry commie teeth

And yet, the button beckons, twinkling, softly moaning
Little shivers of delight run through your fingers,
You orgasm in your pants at nasty nasty thoughts,
Of commies, dead, in very large and lubricated piles

The button blinks one final time,
and then, with trembling eagerness, the flaw is fixed, the world made right

The button pushed.


I was reading about Martin Luther, in order so I could figure out how to get the funny hat guy to entertain me by excommunicating me. Here is what the funny hat guy done gone to Martin Luther:

The bull condemned forty-one propositions extracted from Luther?s writings as scandalous, heretical, and damnable. It left room, however, for the recovery of the lost son of the Church if Luther would make proof of the sincerity of his penitence by reading his recantation and committing all of his books to the flames within a sixty-day period. Failing to submit and obey, Luther and all of his adherents were pronounced accursed. All princes and magistrates were enjoined to apprehend and send them to Rome, or banish them fro their country. The towns in which they continued to reside were placed under interdict, and everyone who opposed the publication and execution of the bull was excommunicated from the Church.

Heh. Looks like this was GNU/Excommunication - i.e. it virally infected everything it touched.
However, the guy that was sent by the funny hat guy to convince the king to knock of Luther didn't do so well:

Rome had launched her bull, but she had yet to see it published in every country of Christendom. In order to accomplish this, two nuncios were chosen to attend to the mission?Eck and Aleander. Bearing the bull which he had so large a share in fabricating, Eck viewed himself as the very Atlas who bore up the sinking Roman world. As he passed through German towns, he met with coldness and contempt. His progress was more like that of a fugitive than a conqueror. At times he was even forced to seek shelter in the nearest convent to avoid the popular fury.
The elector?s statement pointed directly to a hearing before the Diet soon to be convened at Worms. Knowing the courage and eloquence of Luther, nothing could have been more disagreeable with Aleander. He dreaded the impression that Luther?s appearance would create, and he had no interest in meeting him in a debate or to win from him any more victories of the sort Eck so loudly boasted. From his travels in Germany, he knew how popular the cause of Protestantism had already become. Wherever it was known that he was the opponent of Luther, it was only with difficulty that he was able to find admittance at a respectable inn; and even in these, the portrait of the monk stared back at him from the walls of almost every bedroom in which he slept. Besides, Luther had already been excommunicated. To grant him a hearing under such circumstances would surely give the appearance that the pope?s sentence might be reversed by secular authority, making the chair of Peter subordinate to the States-General of Germany. On all of these grounds, the papal nuncio was resolved to oppose to the uttermost Luther?s appearance before the Diet.

That's so lame. The pope sucks - couldn't he get an assassin or something?. However this reverse trolling of the pope practiced by the little fuhers (Germans) brings up a good point. We too should hang a picture of W in every teacher's lounge, and in every college classroom. The commies need to know their master. No matter how much the godless commies try to spin the truth, we know what it is. No BBC journalist will save them. Here is an entertaining tidbit about he BBC:

Jeremy Harris, Dr Rowan Williams's secretary for public affairs, wrote a three-page memorandum, entitled Notes towards a Handling Strategy on Gay Issues, outlining how the Church could manipulate the media.

Mr Harris is a former BBC journalist with great influence at Lambeth Palace.

Until next time dead reader,
Good night and don't let the commies bite!

Saturday, November 08, 2003
My God! How can someone sink so low?

I was recently searching the internet for cockroach squishing (i.e. pointy toed) leather ostrich boots, so I could impress all the illiterate Mexicans here in Texas.

So I search google for: leather boots texas
and I get back some nice results for Texas leather boots.
However, just for kicks, I search google for: leather boots massachusetts.

Leather Boots Gay
... white Gay Cigar Fetish would you like to help me finish, stevie whispered
softly. massachussetts nice tip, huh. ... denver. Leather Boots Gay. leather_boots_gay.html - Similar pages

Denver Gay Leather Bar
... vidoes Rubber Boots Sniff Gay Gay Sniff Boots Rubber. ... Gay Leather Club. ... massachussetts
Gay uh, well, he said slowly, i guess i really dont know much of anything ... denver_gay_leather_bar.html - Similar pages
[ More results from ]

Leather Boots Gay
... massachussetts Leather Boots Gay krista leaned back in her seat and
replied, thank you, miss redmond, i certainly appreciate it. ... leather-boots-gay.html - Similar pages

Pictures Of Hot Gay Trucker's-high Leather WORK BOOTS
... massachussetts why should i, he replied, you already came in the bathroom, you ... clips
Pictures Of Hot Gay Trucker's-high Leather WORK BOOTS now deciding to ... pictures-of-hot-gay-truckers-high-leather-WORK-BOOTS.html - Similar pages

Gay Spanking Drawings
... massachussetts i dont know what youve heard about stanton ingalls, miss waller went
on, but let me tell you this, from personal experience he ... Leather Boots Gay. ... gay-spanking-drawings.html - Similar pages

Leather Uniform Gay
... engines Rubber Boots Sniff Gay Boots Gay Sniff Gay. ... massachussetts Stories Giant
Gay Giant Foot Fetish Stories the only way to take the pain ... Leather Chaps Gay. ... Leather-Uniform-Gay.html - Similar pages
[ More results from ]

This shocked me speechless. It was so horrible, I was struck mute. How dare the fucking godless commies in the swamp of frozen communism up north pervert leather boots, the boots worn by ALL the heroes of America, into a gay fetish? How dare these cowards! I am livid. I am mad beyond belief. THIS TIME THEY HAVE GONE TOO FAR. THIS MEANS WAR! AS LONG AS I DRAW BREATH, I WILL NOT REST UNTIL EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS STABBED! I SWEAR BY THE HOLY GOD!

Hoping to take the taste of this horrible tragedy out of my mouth, I decided to read the newspapers. I see that the economy is recovering, according to the New York Times. New jobs are being created, and unemployment is falling. 3 Months of Job Growth Best in 3 Years says the communist propaganda official newspaper - The New York Times.
And then, events took a fatal turn, I started thinking.
Why would the communists print something that guarantees Bush the next election?
It's obvious - only because what they print is lies that they plan to attribute to Bush later and blame him for telling.

Americans, its time to face the truth about your so called unemployment.
You will not read the truth from the raving lunatic communists like John Kerry or Ted KKKennedy, nor the weak ineffective communists like George Bush or Bill Oreilley. BUT YOU WILL READ IT HERE:

Any unemployment number must count men, women, children, and old people. It must count artists, musicians, mimes, street corner performers, prisoners, soldiers, day laborers, illegal immigrant farm workers, temps, part time janitors and consultants. The so called numbers seen in the communist times count none of these. Why don't we count people who don't want to work, or for whom it is not socially acceptable to work (like CEOs and other high society)? And even when all these people are counted, and we get a real unemployment number somewhere between 30-60%, that is still not the truth. Are you ready? Can you handle the truth? We will see, we will see....

Real unemployment must include a judgment about Moral and Useful Work. Work that helps and not hurts. Positive work, and not negative work.
Is a bureaucrat that works for a large chemical company to hide its mass murders really a worker? No, he obviously is a criminal. Is he counted as one? No. Are homeless people workers? After all they provide employment and entertainment and self justification for other people who like to oppress/help [same thing] them, do they not? Is a government worker, really a worker or a mass murderer? What if the government worker does nothing useful? What about a general that orders mass murder? Surely there is SOMEONE, responsible for the mass murder? Where exactly does the buck stop?

I estimate that only about 5% of Americans are morally and usefully employed. All the rest are various sorts of criminal and communist.

No my dear readers, you can not handle the truth.

P.S. I recently discovered a cache of documents left by some very distant relatives of my family, some of whom used to be plantation owners. There was a well known disturbing leather bound book titled "Nigger Owner's Manual" in there.

Wednesday, November 05, 2003
I was reading about the judge that ruled killing constitutional (I also think killing is a constitutional right reserved for the individual, like everyone else in Texas). He says:

Kopf had expressed serious reservations about the new law during the hearing, saying, "It seems to me the law is highly suspect, if not a per se violation of the Constitution."

He said the law appears to have a "serious vagueness problem," and that the congressional record of debate on the bill did not reflect an objective presentation of facts.

Does anyone know why the vicious communist thieving monkeys that wrote our constitution decided to create a judicial branch? After that cool commie stabbing move by the judge above, I decided to take a glance at the Federalist Toilet Papers, and here is what they say:

Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary . . . may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.

This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two . . . that . . . the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter;

Huh? Are these crack monkeys insane? What kind of insane statement is that? Here is a trivial counter example: Congress passes law to kill all jooooooos. Jew sues to stop law. Jew loses case. President kills all joooooos. How is killing a Jew not against the Jew citizen's right to life liberty and pursuit of happiness? The fact of the matter is, congress passes crappy laws 95% of the time. The outraged citizens go to the judiciary to get these crappy unconstitutional laws overturned. The judicial branch denies them. The president carries out the law. This is a recipe for efficient mass murder, not protection of individual rights.
Personally, I prefer a system where if you, a legislator, successfully pass a law, any law, you get shot. Then we KNOW for sure they really meant the law and the law is important.


The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution, I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex-post-facto laws, and the like. Limitations of this kind can be preserved in practice no other way than through the medium of the courts of justice, whose duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing.

Huh? How the hell can you smoke so much crack at once??? Independence from what??? Stupidity??? Last I heard, there was no way to declare independence from that!

Anyway, it goes on in this way for pages and pages, trying to justify why we need more British wig wearing communist cross dressers.

The judicial branch is an obvious farce. How the hell is getting an intermediate law interpreter (i.e. someone who is not the one that has the gun) any safer than having the guy with the gun making the decisions? Its not!!!! It just leads to miscommunication and ambiguity. I bet those British wig wearing cross dressers paid the crack monkeys some bribes to get this elite set of middle men put into the constitution. Because of these crack monkeys, we are exactly like Iran, with their religious law interpreting middlemen.

This is what we are going to get when we set up a system exactly like the one in Iran:

The marriage age for girls has been reduced to 9 years of age.
"The most suitable time for a girl to get married is the time when the girl can have her first menstrual period in her husband's house rather than her father's." - Ayatollah Khomeini

"The specific task of women in this society is to marry and bear children. They will be discouraged from entering legislative, judicial, or what ever careers which may require decision making, as women lack the intellectual ability and discerning judgment required for theses careers." - Ayatollah Mutahari

Men sit in the front of the bus while women sit in the back. Married couples are not allowed to sit together in the public transportation.

Men and women are not allowed to swim, ski, play tennis, or perform any sports together, even if they are related to each other.

Married couples, brothers and sisters, fathers and daughters, mothers and sons and other kin related must have the proof of kinship at all times.

Single women are not allowed to rent a car, hotel room, travel alone or marry foreigners without the permission of the governmental officials.

Women are only to see female doctors and dentists and are to be tought by female teachers and professors. In a country that education is denied for women, it be difficult to find female of any profession. This only proves that the Islamic Republic has no respect for women and their lives.

Men cannot study gynecology and obstetrics. Men are not allowed to examine the reproductive part of women.

Women who slightly break the rules of hijab are given a document to sign which requires them to admit to prostitution and for this they are flagellated 150 times.

People are not allowed to have music, dancing, parties or any other social gathering even in the privacy of their own homes.

The only thing married couples are allowed to do together is to bread and they have been quite successful at it. In the past 16 years the population of Iran has doubled from 35 million to nearly 70 million with approximately five million living abroad.

The only things the Islamic Republic has brought to the Iranian people are poverty, pain and misery. We, the freedom loving Iranian people, condemn the barbaric Government of Islamic Republic and ask for helping hands from all freedom fighters all over the globe in order to separate church and state in Iran, to establish the Universal Human Rights as declared by the United Nations 1948 General Assembly, to bring about the equality between men and women of Iran and to abolish the sexual apartheid.

Notice how even the outraged Iranians look up to the United Nations - the social club for mass murdering joooooo hating dictators. Well, commie see, commie do.

Stab them all now for being contradictory hypocrites. Let no single human on this earth go unstabbed!

Tuesday, November 04, 2003
As many of you have noticed, not only am I pro crime, but I'm also pro terrorist. Of-course, since I am a very very fair person, I'm also pro shooting and stabbing criminals and terrorists, so you could just say I'm pro entertainment. You'd be wrong. I'm pro crime and pro shooting criminals.
I found this in the comments of another hilarious IMAO:

We all know about the negatives of terrorism, but we rarely here about the positives.

The benefits of terrorism:
- Economy helped by increased sales of gas masks, batteries, coffins

- Tax payers finally get value for money from weapons that would otherwise go un-used.

- Helps protect tradition by bringing back Holy Wars that everyone had forgotten about

- Creates exciting games of international hide-and-seek (good for otherwise-unemployed bounty hunters)

- Television suddenly becomes informative and entertaining

- Encourages creative thinking amongst Muslim clerics and left-wing academics in concocting Jewish conspiracy theories

- Allows washed-up stars like Bruce Springstein to win grammies they otherwise wouldn't win.

- Provide young middle-eastern kids with quality combat education

Since I am very fair, I don't support peace in the middle east in any way, shape, or form. Peace would be fundamentally unfair to both sides. I think people who are stupid enough to fight over rocks and pieces of desert and religion, deserve exactly what they have now. If I was the Israelis, I would just move the fuck out and then nuke the whole area. Just invade Syria and call it New Israel. If I was the Palestinians, I would just start kidnapping and eating Israelis. It's much better then telling your children to explode. The whole exploding thing is sick-cool. This is what happens when you let Palestinian parents and their dictators (Arafat) watch western cartoons like Tom and Jerry all day and play violent video games. Its not the children we have to worry about, its the parents.

For those of you that didn't believe the above link, Arafat's love of Cartoons is well documented, and it is well known that Arafat's strategy against the Jews is based on Tom and Jerry.

Speaking of equal treatment of idiots and being fair, I read an interview today that talked about the "Fairness Doctrine" and how the media had to give equal time to idiots on both side of the issue. Here is an excerpt:

John Hawkins: Let me ask you another radio related question. If the Fairness Doctrine were implemented again as so many on the left want, what would it do to talk radio?

Michael Medved: It would destroy it. The problem with the Fairness Doctrine is not that it insures balance, there's nothing wrong with balance, it's that it insures less political conversation. In other words, if people knew they had to balance a very successful broadcast of the Michael Medved show with some new liberal show that might or might not succeed, that makes my show a much less attractive investment.

John Hawkins: Because they'd have to give three hours to a show that's not going to make money like your show does.

Michael Medved: Exactly. If you're going to be regulated in terms of content, why mess with political content? You can just go with Tom Leykis, with shock talk, sort of FM talk, or sort of the bland, non-controversial, a little bit of this, a little bit of that type of show.

But the striking thing about talk radio today is not that there is more conservative talk, but that there is more political talk. This entire format did not exist at one point. Basically, the Fairness Doctrine has always had and would have again a chilling impact on that kind of public dialogue.

Then he goes exploding from his rocker and starts saying that communists should oppress themselves:

John Hawkins: Speaking of that, in your opinion, what would it take to solve the Israeli/Palestinian conflict within let's say a decade or so, if it's solvable?

Michael Medved: A total reformation of Palestinian society and a much more firm assertion of leadership from those sane voices that do exist within the Palestinian madness. People are right about this, that basically what is going to be necessary is something like a Palestinian civil war. The truth about Hamas and Islamic Jihad is that they don't prevent Israel from existing or even flourishing, they prevent Palestine from coming into existence. The only way a Palestinian state will ever exist is if those terrorist structures are dismantled, even if they will never be entirely eliminated. I don't think America will ever totally wipe out Al-Qaeda, but that doesn't mean we don't have to do our best to degrade their ability to harm us.

One of the things that I think is the absolute crucial focus for any peace in the Middle East, is the figure of a Palestinian cop. Cops are good people, it's one of the lessons that I learned many years that helped make me a conservative. Cops are on the side of civilization. Even troubled and unhappy cops exist to try to make normal, peaceful life possible. It's one of the reasons I think Israel went along in Oslo with the creation of these paramilitary forces. It's because they recognized that if you have enough Palestinian cops, it becomes their job to work with the forces of civilization on the Israeli side. That's truly is what's necessary. The emergence of Palestinian cops will facilitate the removal of Israeli soldiers who do not want to be there anyway.

Oh yeah, let the Palestinians oppress themselves with kkkops. Who would explode Jewish babies if the palestonions were oppressed? This is unfair to the jewish babies. This Medved guy needs to stop taking this "Fairness doctrine" so seriously. Well at least he clarifies that he is against independent voting later in the interview:

[Talking about Libertarians] The reason I enjoy talking to these guys on the air is because they are so utterly incapable of answering the question, "Ok, what have you accomplished with all of your activism?" The answer is absolutely nothing except electing a bunch of ultra-liberal Democrats and big government types like Maria Cantwell. Our Senator from Washington state, Maria Cantwell, would not be in office were it not for the "Losertarians". She beat Slade Gorton by less than 3000 votes and the "Losertarian" candidate got 66,000 votes. That kind of outcome is sad and appalling and it's unfair to decent people who work seriously in politics.

I do think it's very telling that the "Losertarians" have all decided to have a mass migration to New Hampshire to try to takeover that state. Good luck to them and I think that's a much more useful way to use their time than trying to run morons for President.

Pretty funny, actually.

Saturday, November 01, 2003
As many of you know, there was a cool video on TV showing a guy walking up to a man, emptying a handgun into him (at least 6 shots), and then walking away. It turns out that the shooter also had another gun that he chose not to use because he probably thought the first gun did the job. The motive for this injured man shooting the lawyer, was that the lawyer was stealing money from his trust fund, which was funded with the money gained from a personal injury settlement. The shooter said he needed the money for medical expenses. Here is an account with the video.

Public opinion almost uniformly thinks the shooter is a hero, and yet the communist enforcers have him locked up on $500,000 bail. But this is not what I wanted to talk about.

I started thinking. This man used a gun - the same gun anyone else would use, exactly as intended. The gun was no different from any other gun. The shooter even thought the gun did the job. Yet the so called victim (i.e. the scum sucking lawyer) walked away basically unharmed. How could this be?

Why would the shooter have such a mental block, such utter disregard for evident reality, that he didn't even pull out his second gun to finish his heroic task? Was it because he believed guns were useful for killing and could not imagine that they didn't work?

Dear readers, Its time to face the facts.

The Second Amendment is a fraud.

It gives NO POWER to the people because guns are a liberal myth. You saw it with your own eyes!

The guns that the homeless crack monkeys that wrote the constitution were talking about have nothing to do with what you have been brainwashed to believe a gun is. Guns provide no personal protection, and they do not deter the government from oppressing you in the slightest. In fact, there is ample evidence that guns and gun possession cause the communists to oppress you. You have been warned.

Trust nothing in the constitution and its amendments. Every time it talks about some mythical recourse you have to stop the power of communist government, it is guaranteed to be a fraud. Here is the truth about all your so called rights and powers.

State of The Blog (Union) Address:

Well, I've just about run out of ideas as to what to do with this internet thing.

Lets recap the results of the First Annual Law Enforcement Trolling Investigation:

1) I came out as Pro Crime.

2) I prayed for God to cook and eat Gray Davis.

3) I said sexual harassment is consentual.

4) I threatened to drain Massachussetts like Sadaam drained the marshes.

5) I offered chimps as prostitutes to congressmen (not sure what's wrong with that, but its gotta be something).

6) I proved that Joe McCarthy was the best American.

7) I threatened to nuke half the major cities in the United States, France, Canada, Saudi Arabia, and Congress specifically.

8) Bush and Sadaam had a debate and Sadaam won.

9) I said all Arabs were mass murdering thieves.

10) I threatened to stab roughly 75% (conservative estimate) of the earth's population for being communist with very specific and credible threats which included threatening to stab the president and all members of political parties for being communist.

11) I made fun of Jews.

12) I made fun of the IRS.

13) I proved that judges are serial killers and serial rapists.

14) I said all laws are contradictory with each other and the constitution.

15) I was sponsored by several terrorist organizations (see sidebar).

16) I said Democracy and Communism was exactly the same thing.

17) I said all voting was a fraud.

18) I voted for Sadaam in the presidential election.

And I even reported myself on several government web sites.

And what was the result of all of this? Zip. Zero. Nothing.

Law Enforcement Completely Failed to be Trolled.

This internet thing is so stupid.
Now what do I do?

Powered by Blogger