helping commies get to know knives
Sunday, February 29, 2004
The biggest justification in favor of communism these days seems to be "rising health care costs". Well, Bad Commie knows how to control costs. BY STABBING COMMIES. Incidentally, that's also how you control commies.
In general, most doctors are sheep who don't give a shit about your health. As a simple example - take the case of prescribing "cover your ass" medication - If a doctor gave a shit about you and your wallet - he would tell you to get the drugs from Canada for half the price. They don't give a shit about you or your health. They just want to avoid getting sued by democratic trial lawyers.
"I measured his vitamin D level and it was basically zero," he said. "His chest and low back pain were not due to cardiac or spinal disease but to low vitamin D. We put him on prescription strength vitamin D and he got much better. We had spent over $200,000 on him in the hospital for these other procedures without doing a $20 blood test."
Another way in which doctors don't give a shit about you is because they are ego driven maniacs who refuse to put in place accurate diagnosis systems. With the advent of computers, each patient should have to answer about 50 computer questions in the waiting room to accurately diagnose his problem ten times better than a commie doctor. Most doctors do not listen and just ask one or two questions. Some doctors are working to change this. A good example is Problem Knowledge Couplers. Just the implementation of this one thing would cut health care costs in HALF, stop the asshole doctors from ripping us off, and DOUBLE the quality of our health care and even ELIMINATE DOCTORS FROM THE LOOP making the individual responsible for his or her health.
So if a mass murdering commie says you should give him all your money because you need health care - KICK that fucker in the balls and then stab him.
Commies don't give a shit about your health just like they don't care about your education or about your being oppressed due to your being stupid.
OK, now on to less serious things like religion. I just saw the movie "The Passion of the Christ" today. Before I get into my review, I would like to provide some choice excerpts from this article by a TEXAN LAWYER (All good things come from Texas) in IntellectualConservative.com:
I believe, a movie that can be that it can be enjoyed by Christians and non-Christians alike, although the graphic depiction of torture and execution may be somewhat tougher to take if one doesn't have a spiritual context in which to place it (un-anchored from the religious,I suppose some could view it as almost a snuff flick, albeit an incredibly stunning one, visually and in terms of performance).
This is artistic license in favor of the Jews, the Scriptures clearly state that the "whole Sanhedrin" was present for the trial. So, right from the beginning, Gibson destroys the charge that he is portraying "the Jews" as a monolithic group of bloodthirsty monsters out to get Jesus. Instead, what he shows is that this whole proceeding was intentionally hidden from "the Jews" by a small, power-hungry and unscrupulous group of Jews who likely recognize that the larger population of Jerusalem will not stand for such a miscarriage of justice.
It is this same group of Pharisees and Sadducees, along with their handpicked "flash mob", that make their way to the Praetorium for the hearing before Pilate. Thus, in Gibson's depiction, the "bloodthirsty crowd" is not representative of the Jewish population of Jerusalem but is, in fact, shown to be a group formed and manipulated for an express purpose by a few people. If anything, it goes a long way toward showing that the rest of the population could not be guilty of complicity in the condemnation of Jesus because this was meant to be hidden from them until Pilate had issued a death sentence, after which the populace would just assume that judgment had been rendered by the Romans alone. This is nuanced.
There is, overall, not a hint of the antagonism towards Jews qua Jews that the ADL and other commentators have alleged. And, after reading all of the movie reviews, I see even more clearly what I have long suspected: the agenda of the intelligentsia is to employ indirect fire against the substance of the film (i.e., the Gospels themselves), although so-called critics are using all sorts of weapons to attack it: "it's too violent"; "it doesn't tell the whole story", etc. What they ignore, of course, is that Mel Gibson didn't make a movie called "The Life of Jesus" or "Reflections on Jesus' Message". He assumes that people are familiar with the story; what he is trying to drive home is that the central theme of the story -- Jesus' sacrifice -- was exceedingly difficult and exceedingly painful. He's trying to convey a sense of the magnitude of this suffering and, hence, the magnitude of the act itself, undertaken willingly. In this he succeeds magnificently.
There is a manifest failure on a part of a large portion of the chattering class to understand that this image of a brutalized Christ suffering for us is the central theme of Christianity, not some mere sideshow with which Mel Gibson, in his grubby lust for violence, is obsessed.
Secularism is, in fact, a religion, a self-referential and narcissistic religion in which you shall have no other gods before self (see Romans 1:29-57). Remember this when you are told, "don't impose your beliefs on me!"
Well, this guy is exactly right - the movie is very pro-Semitic.
However, in the Bible (in real life?), the Jews DID kill Christ. Mel Gibson goes out of his way to make that as painless and guilt free as possible. And the Pussy Pope even agreed with him. Well, I think that was an error. The Bible isn't about people being basically nice. It's about people being EVIL and causing Christ to suffer. People don't do EVIL things because they are GOOD. They do them because they are EVIL. To deny that basic fact is sheer idiocy and denial of basic human nature to boot.
Of-Course the Bible was most likely a plot by its authors (Romans) to keep the excitable Middle Easterners (Jews, Palestinians, Iraqis, etc) under control. The Middle Easterners were all equally excitable and prone to following prophets. So the Romans needed some sort of tool to make them more easily controllable. It seems probable that one of the Roman Emperors got tired of the nightshirts rebelling all the time and running around and getting excited. So he came up with a really good way to keep them under control. And it worked! It kept them under control so much that they were unable to break free from religion and follow the light of science forward to progress. Roman religion is still oppressing them. I think its clear that middle easterners are ALL Jews. They ALL killed Christ just like they all still kill most of their religious figures, even today. Killing Christ was no big deal - the people of the time killed the local Christ like every day. The big invention of the Romans was in creating a fake passion play where the middle easterners killed Christ SO GOOD that they didn't need to kill him again. Mel Gibson would have made an excellent Roman. Of-Course, all Christs are Commies and deserve to die. Send Commie Christs back to God where they belong!
And I'd like to finish today with how to maintain your liberty - FROM COMMIES.
1. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.
2. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.
3. Glock: The original point and click interface.
4. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.
5. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords?
6. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words.
7. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
8. If you don't know your rights you don't have any.
9. Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
10. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights reserved.
11. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
12. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others.
13. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday. Imagine that! Not even one!
14. Guns only have two enemies: rust and liberals.
15. Know guns, know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety.
16. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.
17. 911 - government sponsored Dial-a-Prayer.
18. Assault is a behavior, not a device.
19. Criminals love gun control -- it makes their jobs safer.
20. If guns cause crime, then matches cause arson.
21. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.
22. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.
23. Enforce the "gun control laws" we have, don't make more.
24. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.
25. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.
26. "...A government of the people, by the people, for the people..."
Saturday, February 28, 2004
Take this, dirty bad commie weasel attorney general of the United States!
Your own loyal lap poodle, your own mommy, The New York Commie Times, betrays you!
You were beaten like a red headed spousal mistake unit by your own mommy! The New York Times!
See the hole in your back? Guess who put it there? The New York Commie Times, that's who.
It is an open question whether Mr. Kerry's past will hurt him now, but his words to the Senate remain a special lightning rod, especially because he described soldiers' actions as "not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command."
"Mr. Kerry said the men told how "they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam."
Sure it's true," Mr. Solis said. "Sure there were people raped, ears cut off and so on. Each one of the things that he mentioned happened, in some cases I know, and in others I'm confident. But when you put them all together in one sentence and say this was well known at every level of command, it impugns, it seems to me, everyone who fought over there and it gives the impression that everyone who fought over there was a war criminal and that's just not true."
Mr. Kerry concluded his 1971 testimony by demanding, "Where are the leaders of our country?" and his spokeswoman, Ms. Cutter, said: "Clearly, in his testimony, he defended these soldiers and their actions as the fault of the war, not the warriors."
Some of the testimony at the Winter Soldier Investigation was later discredited, and Mr. Kerry has since said he did not witness atrocities.
How about that time when you killed women and children in your 4 month long jaunt along the river? Remember that, you "commie serial killer commie" ? Huh? That ring any bells, you liar?
Hah! And does the New York Commie Times give me any credit? No. No it doesn't. Communism never gives anyone else any credit. Capitalism was mass murdering people way before commmunism and does capitalism get any credit? No...
Just remember readers: I KNOW AN UNSTABBED COMMIE WHEN I SEE ONE.
Over and Out.
Bad Commie: I showed that dirty weasel attorney general good, didn't I?
Osama bin Texan: Yes you did.
Osama bin Texan: What will really show him is when Kerry is President
Osama bin Texan: and his troops come by his house to commit some atrocities
Bad Commie: Yes
Osama bin Texan: Hopefully on Live TV
Bad Commie: I love the smell of fresh roasted commie weasel in the morning
Friday, February 27, 2004
Commies for Christ:
My tag's Tall Tim
(no need to shout)
I said that's my name
(so don't wear it out)
You see me here, I'm running hot
I'm a juicy hamburger 'cos I got the lot
I got a bone the size of a Tyrannosaurus Rex
Only one thing, I want your sex
My name is Tricky Ricky, if the situation's sticky
Then I'm your man, I got a plan
I used to be a brickie
I don't give a damn about what you say
And if you don't like that you'd better walk this way
(Rock it Tricky Ricky, gonna rock it to the left
Rock it Tricky Ricky, gonna rock it to the right)
My name is Paul, I'm the best of all
'Cos I'm in your face like a can of mace
I'm a groove lick, love child, king of the verse
You mess with me boy, you leave in a hearse
Your God is a nothing God
Is a mealy mouthed God
Is a weak arsed God
My God is a really tough God
Is a straight line God
Is a good ole boy
Your God drinks peach nectar
Eats boiled fruit
Can't fart out loud
My God arm wrestled Khruschev
Eats meat, farts with pride
Commies for Christ
Hammers and sickles and the word's not flesh - it's steel
Commies for Christ
'Cos he's the man that carved the lamb - and made us feel
Commies for Christ
I'm having a sexual fling with a red under my bed
Commies for Christ
Drank too much altar wine, it's gone straight to my head
Take Marx, take Christ, take drugs
Take Marx, take Christ, take dr dr dr dr dr drugs
My God is a vengeful God
Is Cecil B. de Mille
He kills for the fun of it
(Rep rep repetition, rep rep repetition, yo, yo)
Your God been around for too long
Can't get down, is an aging hippy
(Hippy, hippy, skippy, skippy)
(Tch, tch, tch, tch, tch, tch, tch, tch, tch)
Commies for Christ
Go get some long knives to carve up these loaves and fishes
Commies for Christ
Support the cause or else someone could get vicious
Commies for Christ
'Cos he's the word you've heard - The truth, the light, the way
My God ain't risen, 'cos he's sleepin' in today
Take Marx, take Christ, take drugs
Take Marx, take Christ, take drugs
Commies for C C C CC CCC Coca Cola
Also, here is an excellent song about Mexican Hitler.
Back to politics: Here is an excellent summary of Howard Dean (I'd rather talk about Dean than the serial killer communist John Kerry):
Liberal Dean supporters had to hope that his entire record as governor of Vermont was irrelevant to how he would govern as president. In Montpelier, Dean often tried to curry favor with business rather than fight it. He was constantly clashing with the Progressive Coalition that stood behind far-left Congressman Bernie Sanders rather than realizing their policy goals. He had an A rating from that bete noire of the liberal establishment, the National Rifle Association.
Dean's nonliberal backers had to base their faith on even more remote possibilities. For example, they needed to hope that the way he was campaigning for president and the policies he was including in his platform would prove irrelevant to the way he behaved in office, or at least less relevant than his more milk-and-water governorship. They had to overlook his promise to raise taxes across the board, rescind deregulation and grow all manner of government programs and instead focus on his promise to balance the budget.
Check out this bullshit. Retarded nigger hating religious racist democrats are writing articles like "The Tragedy of Colin Powell. How the Bush presidency destroyed him."
That's funny. I didn't notice Colin Powell was dead. Bad Commie didn't lose any respect for him. I still think he'd make a fine president. Much better then the serial killer commie John Kerry. Maybe the democra-commies are planning to give him cancer? The democrats get all upset when niggers don't toe the party line about how they are all victims who can't succeed. I guess that's why they have to have a pretend KKK lynching of nigger Powell. But no amount of democratic nigger hate can equal their hate of Nader. How dare that Nader guy say democrats are just like the republicans! He must be killed for the sake of social justice (i.e. mass murdering communism).
More on Social Justice:
The signature of modern leftist rhetoric is the deployment of terminology that simply cannot fail to command assent. As Orwell himself recognized, even slavery could be sold if labeled "freedom." In this vein, who could ever conscientiously oppose the pursuit of "social justice," -- i.e., a just society?
To understand "social justice," we must contrast it with the earlier view of justice against which it was conceived -- one that arose as a revolt against political absolutism. With a government (e.g., a monarchy) that is granted absolute power, it is impossible to speak of any injustice on its part. If it can do anything, it can't do anything "wrong." Justice as a political/legal term can begin only when limitations are placed upon the sovereign, i.e., when men define what is unjust for government to do. The historical realization traces from the Roman senate to Magna Carta to the U.S. Constitution to the 19th century. It was now a matter of "justice" that government not arrest citizens arbitrarily, sanction their bondage by others, persecute them for their religion or speech, seize their property, or prevent their travel.
This culmination of centuries of ideas and struggles became known as liberalism. And it was precisely in opposition to this liberalism -- not feudalism or theocracy or the ancien régime, much less 20th century fascism -- that Karl Marx formed and detailed the popular concept of "social justice," (which has become a kind of "new and improved" substitute for a storeful of other terms -- Marxism, socialism, collectivism -- that, in the wake of Communism's history and collapse, are now unsellable).
And finally, a word from Mr. Green:
Things about which I agree with Bush: National Security
Things about which I disagree with Bush: Everything Else (gay marriage, faith-based initiatives, massive deficit spending, his willful refusal to acquire any information not spoon-fed to him by his handlers/trainers, expanding Medicare, immigration, the Patriot Act, cuddling up with the House of Saud, etc.)
Things about which I agree with Kerry: Everything*
Things about which I disagree with Kerry: Everything*
Every election I think the choice between the lesser of two evils is the hardest ever, and four years later it just gets worse.
* Depending on what side of his mouth you're listening to at the time.
Thursday, February 26, 2004
Wow, Wow. Everyone please read this article.
San Francisco really is a hell-hole of idiocy. Why isn't Arnold revoking the accreditation of these fuckers? People need 10 year prison terms here.
This makes me very very mad. Commies should not be allowed to oppress people like
Tatiana Menaker is a Russian emigre who knows first-hand about persecution and indoctrination. She was a journalist in her native Russia, and she came to America in 1986, a divorcee with two small children and only $90 in her pocket. A Jewish refusenik against the old Soviet Communist regime, she continued as a journalist writing for the Russian-Jewish community. Later, she bought a small tour van and began giving tours of San Francisco to supplement her income. Three years ago she enrolled at San Francisco State University to better her English. To her dismay, she found the same anti-Semitism and Marxist dogmas prevalent in her previous homeland right here in the U.S.A. at San Francisco State. She frequently found herself arguing with professors who extolled the glories of Marxism and she spoke out frequently at anti-Semitic rallies on campus.
[Guess what the commies did to her? THEY PURGED HER!!!! I'm never going to Commiefornia. At least she is not alone:]
And in that regard she is not alone. The SFSU campus chapter of Students For Academic Freedom, the Jewish Anti-defamation League, the Jewish Community Relations Council, DAFKA, and other civil rights groups along with the Russian Jewish community have all stepped up to support Tatiana in her time of need by providing her written support as well as free legal services. All of these groups understand how important it is to back her up in her fight against political indoctrination and anti-Semitism on a campus where leftist ideological groups turn their opponents into outlaws in order to subjugate and silence them.
If you would like to be a part of or assist the Committee to Defend Tatiana Menaker, please send e-mail to: email@example.com.
Wednesday, February 25, 2004
Seems like the mass murdering serial killer communist traitor (all those objective labels are well deserved and verified by many people) John Kerry is desperately trying to link criticism of his questionable "service" in Vietnam with criticism of his even more questionable voting record.
This is in order to make the dubious rhetorical brainwashing link that criticizing his voting record is like criticizing American soldiers. Incidentally, was his service in Vietnam to commies? Because that fucker sure wasn't fighting on our side.
The only thing more treasonous that the scum John Kerry, is the tv media right-left axis of evil. The media makes it perfectly clear, at the point of a gun, that I must accept the insulting hypothesis that Kerry did something useful in Vietnam. If Kerry was a war hero, it literally makes 95% of the other Vietnam veterans war criminals. That's how big the divide between Kerry and those veterans is. The holier than thou elitist actually called 95% of vietnam vets "war criminals" too, BTW. Only now he needs to pretend he's on their side.
I'm not so much upset that he voted against big government republican defense programs consistently. I am upset at his consistently communist ratings as determined by many many interest groups. Here is the scoop. Some excerpts:
The "liberal" side:
2003 On the votes that the National Committee for an Effective Congress considered to be the most important in the first quarter of 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
2003 On the votes that the U.S. Public Interest Research Group considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 95 percent of the time.
2003 On the votes that the Friends Comm. on Nat'l Leg. considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time.
The "Against big spending assholes who are compassionate to their cronies with money they steal at the point of a gun side":
Here is a doozy: Public Citizen's Congress Watch: Congressional lobby representing consumer interests, specifically citizens' access to government decisionmaking, campaign finance reform, the S & L crisis, consumer class actions, food and product safety, and protection of public health through environmental legislation.
2003 On the votes that the Public Citizen's Congress Watch considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 27 percent of the time.
2001-2002 On the votes that the League of Private Property Voters considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.
2003 On the votes that the Americans for Tax Reform considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.
2002 On the votes that the Americans for Tax Reform considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 10 percent of the time.
2002 According to the National Taxpayers Union, in 2002 Senator Kerry, on ALL votes dealing with spending, voted to reduce or not increase spending 18 percent of the time.
2002 On the votes that the Citizens Against Government Waste considered to be the most important in 2002, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 13 percent of the time.
The "conservative" side:
2003 On the votes that the Christian Coalition considered to be the most important in 2003 , Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.
2003 On the votes that the Eagle Forum considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.
2003 On the votes that the Campaign for Working Families considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 7 percent of the time.
2003 On the votes that the American Conservative Union considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Kerry voted their preferred position 13 percent of the time.
BTW, I encourage everyone to look at the ratings these interest groups assign - you will see that what looks like the majority of democrats and republicans get a wide range of ratings. In other words, its only a very few assholes in congress that are Hitler saluting group think partisans. Kerry is one of them. As further information, you can examine the ratings of my hero: the libertarian Ron Paul.
Taking all of those facts into account you will see that the partisan conservative groups are about 25% communist (usually on social issues), while the partisan liberal groups are about 60% communist (usually on economic issues). I'm not for or against republicans or democrats. They are empty-shell ego parties filled by the people that make them up. But the hypocrisy of individuals WILL NOT BE IGNORED.
Who is a divisive communist asshole now? John Kerry, that's who. And he's been that way for the last 30 years too.
As an interesting aside, Greg Easterbrook says Kerry's position on Vietnam may mirror the beliefs of Americans:
Pundits of the left and right are now engaged in tormented disputes about the nuances of Kerry's Vietnam statements and actions more than 30 years ago, but this misses the big picture. The big picture is that Kerry thought the war was wrong but went anyway because he felt it was his duty. Millions of Americans have a friend or family member who hated the Vietnam War but served. Trying to sort out the good and bad of Vietnam in their minds, large numbers of Americans seem to have come to the conclusion that it was a bad war but those who served should be admired. This is a powerful, basic point in Kerry's favor, and commentators seem to be missing it.
Even though the broad picture may be the same, the devil is in the details. And the details say
John Kerry is a mass murdering serial killing war criminal commie.
Researching George Bush, I find:
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH REFUSED TO PROVIDE ANY
RESPONSES TO CITIZENS ON ISSUES THROUGH THE
NATIONAL POLITICAL AWARENESS TEST
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH REFUSED TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION WHEN ASKED TO DO SO ON 23 SEPARATE OCCASIONS BY:
New Hampshire Public Broadcasting
St. Paul Pioneer Press
Iowa Public Radio
Ames Daily Tribune
Cedar Rapids Gazette
Iowa City Press
The State (SC)
San Jose Mercury News
Geraldine Ferraro, Former Democratic Congresswoman
Michael Dukakis, Fomer Democratic Congressman
Bill Frenzel, Former Republican Congressman
Jim Leach, Republican Congressman
Richard Kimball, Project Vote Smart President
Heh, interesting. Guess W didn't want to admit he was a democrat.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie,
deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth,
persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.
--John F. Kennedy, lynched by Texans
The fact that John Kerry is a mass murdering serial killer communist traitor is neither myth nor lie, but truth.
If you don't want to believe me, believe someone who was there:
1. Did Kerry's actions rise to the level of being Treason in the legal sense-No
2. Did Kerry's action betray his brothers in arms-Yes
3. Did Kerry's actions and the Antiwar movement injury the American Soldiers-Yes
4. Did Kerry's actions give aid and comfort to our enemies-Yes
5.Were Kerry's actions used against our POW'S as a propaganda tool to demoralize them-YES
6. Did Kerry's action prolong the war and cause additional American lives-Yes
7. Did Kerry's action help lose the Vietnam war-Yes
8. Were Kerry's acts real acts of bravery warranting awards for bravery/gallantry-No
9. Could Kerry's acts be considered war crimes-Yes
10. Were Kerry's allegations against his brothers in arms truthful-No
11. Did Kerry and the antiwar movement, knowingly or should have known, resort to phonies Vietnam Vets to support their allegations?-Yes
12. As a Naval Commissioned Officer, who served in Vietnam, he should have known his testimony and those false soldiers were false-Yes
13. As a Naval Commissioned Officer, did Kerry have an obligation to validate the horror stories being told by his False Vietnam Veterans-Yes
14. Does the defense of Kerry statement that he had no direct knowledge of the allegations, but then made the allegations excuse his actions?-No
15. Did Kerry's serve two full tours in Vietnam-No
16. Did Kerry serve only 4 months in combat-Yes
18. Should Kerry's actions during Vietnam be a topic for his run for Presidency-Yes
19. Did the American soldiers routinely violate the rules of war by indiscriminate torture and killing of Vietnamese as alleged by Kerry and his False Vietnam Veterans-No
20. Should the killing of the wounded, unarmed enemy soldier be investigated as a war crime-Yes
21. Should the killing of innocent Vietnamese citizens by be investigated as a war crime-Yes
Saturday, February 21, 2004
Why is it that when Californians hate gays and don't want to pay them 10,000 dollars a year, they are "against same sex marriage". And why is it that when the republicans hate gays, they "hate gays" and are not "against same sex marriage"? Hmmmm? Californians can't hate anyone but all republicans know how to do is hate? Hmmmm? After all, there is a world of difference between gender and sexual orientation.
And why is Gay Texas Governor Gay Rick
Perry having Gay Sex with A DEMOCRAT
(also gay)? A DEMOCRAT MAN?
I guess the important point is that he is a man, not that he is a democrat. I guess. I'm not sure.
Full details here. Here. Here. And Here.
In Texas, many preachers think democrats are an almost mythical evil, because they have never met one, just like they have never met the Devil. But they know in their closeted hearts, that some men like assholes. You know - Texan assholes.
Coicncidentally, this makes Rick Perry's marriage a GAY MARRIAGE.
Remember folks, Bad Commie, pioneered sex between republicans and democrats first! Bad Commie's master plan to entertain Bad Commie took just one week to fully and irrevocably implement.
Suggestions for signs Osama bin Texan could hold up in front of Texas statehouse:
"Don't let California gay marry people before Texas! Help Rick Perry catch up!"
"Make an honest fag out of Perry -- Shotgun marriage NOW !"
"Perry & Geoff in 2004" then underneath in smaller letters: "no, we're not talking about an election"
"Monica Geoffwinsky strikes again!"
And even if this turns out to be lies, remember the truth is always more entertaining.
P.S. Betty Bowers copycatted Bad Commie on this whole gay texan marriage issue.
If only Texans were clothed in fine Bad Commie Anti Commie Tshirts, this kind of crap would not be happening. Why are Texans having gay sex with each other instead of oppressing wetbacks? We gave Texans a state so they could beat back Mexico. Why haven't Texans finished the job and invaded? Hmmm? I might have to use the word "pussy" and "boot licker" and "republi-commie" some more. Pointing out Texans are gay is like pointing out that blacks are stupid. Everyone thinks its OK to say blacks are better athletes. What if your culture valued athletes more than smarts? Oh wait, sorry, wrong state. Must think in Texan. My commie heritage is showing. Anyway, Thomas Sowell explains the equality dogma here.
Some more links on why John Kerry is an idiot, uniformly hated by veterans (despite the lies of the media who think he is "respected"- FOX news included) here and here.
Friday, February 20, 2004
Bad Commie has been busy feeling up the statue of naked Justice that Ashcroft covered up. I was groping the curves in the curtain to see if I could find capitalism somewhere. My search was unsuccessful. This was probably because Justice is deaf and dumb, as well as blind. She wandered away from under the curtain because she didn't hear Asscraft telling her to stay there. Incidentally, she probably became deaf and blind by looking at too much porn.
Good thing Asscraft covered her up, since her moral character was so weak.
I wonder if Justice is gay? If Justice was gay, Bad Commie could gay marry Justice. If you marry a lesbian it counts as a gay marriage. Unless the lesbian is ugly and can't get any hot women. Then no one is very happy (i.e. gay). Maybe Asscraft just covered her up because Justice was an UGLY lesbian? You don't see the LIEberals telling you that, do you?
Here is an excellent article saying Americans are very smart and they won't take any minimum wage jobs. Therefore its good if those jobs go to wetbacks:
By contrast, jobs will be created that demand skills to handle the deeper incorporation of information technology, and the pay for these jobs will be high. The demand for computer-support specialists and software engineers, to take two examples, is expected by the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) to double between 2000 and 2010. Demand for database administrators is expected to rise by three-fifths. Among the top score of occupations that the BLS reckons will see the highest growth, half will need IT skills. As it is, between 1999 and 2003 (that is, including during the recession) jobs were created, not lost, in a whole host of white-collar occupations said to be particularly susceptible to outsourcing.
Yes, individuals will be hurt in the process, and the focus of public policy should be directed towards providing a safety net for them, as well as ensuring that Americans have education to match the new jobs being created. By contrast, regarding globalization as the enemy, as Mr Edwards does often and Messrs Kerry and Bush both do by default, is a much greater threat to America's economic health than any Indian software programmer.
I wonder if they realize that the jobs being outsourced ARE the good jobs. Hmmm? Probably not. Oh well. You can't expect the government to be on our side. As a perfect example of the government being on the wrong side - just look at what that fucker Ronald Reagan did - he lost the cold war!
Russia is now much much better off than before that commie Reagan forgot which side he was on.
Reagan was probably a KGB agent.
Speaking of stereotypical KGB agents like Ronald Reagan, here is excellent article about VICIOUS STEREOTYPES in polite society:
One of the less attractive patterns in human behavior is our tendency to stereotype those with whom we disagree, those whose interests conflict with our own, or those who are simply different from ourselves. Such stereotypes create and reinforce prejudice, and they distort our politics, our policy debates, and our constitutional debates. These evils are of course well known; they are an important part of racism, sexism, and discrimination against lesbians and gays. But we do not appear to have generalized the lessons.
Among the educated classes that have been most sensitized to the dangers of the most widely condemned stereotypes, other stereotypes and prejudices flourish. Respected academics and journalists, and respected journals who pride themselves on their tolerance, publish extraordinary statements about groups that have generally failed to engage the sympathies of intellectuals.
Academic hostility to serious religion is part of a larger cultural gulf in contemporary society. The Wall Street Journal denounces limousine liberals, the Beltway crowd, and the white wine and brie set. The people targeted by these labels denounce Reaganites, hardhats, white ethnics, or-if they are above a certain age-Archie Bunker types. Some of these labels target a cluster of attitudes, some target a specific group, and none are used with precision. But from either side, such labels embody a set of political and cultural stereotypes: a whole group of people all have the same bad ideas, and that whole group of people is dangerous.
It is easy to be tolerant of unimportant differences. But all of us tend to think the worst of people who disagree with us on really important things. We tend to assume that our opponents followed the same chain of reasoning we did, so that if they reject our conclusion, they must also reject our most fundamental premise. If they believe that-fill in any belief that really upsets you-then they must also believe even worse things, and if they believe such bad things, they are likely to act on them. We have all thought in this way, and sometimes spoken or written in this way. I do not exempt myself.
But these stereotypes also poison our public discourse, distort our understanding of the real differences among us, and reduce the chances for resolving those differences even in part. These stereotypes corrode the bonds of mutual concern and respect that hold a pluralistic society together. These bonds are stretched enough by honest disagreement and simple demands for change. Once in our history they broke entirely, and some minority groups have been placed outside their protection for long periods. But generally these bonds have held. They make it unsurprising when Americans from "opposite ends of the political and cultural universe" help one another.
To corrode these bonds unnecessarily is a dangerous thing. [Page 403] And we should have no illusions about who is most endangered. In any outbreak of intolerance, in any reduction of mutual concern and respect, the weak and oppressed will suffer more than the strong and dominant. Those who are most endangered by stereotypes and prejudice have special reasons to avoid invoking their own stereotypes and prejudices against others.
Hah! What a commie! I double stabbed him! Commies are mass murdering scum. If he's afraid of that conclusion - THEN HE SHOULDN'T PLAY WITH KNIVES AND COMMIES. SOMETIME PEPLE REALLLY ISS STUPID.
Anyway, I found this really neato article about censorship. You can read it if you want to learn how to uncensor yourself so you can be free like Bad Commie!
What we have here is one of the peculiarities of American censorship: in the US, it's language that gets you in trouble. You can kill as many people as you want, but don't call them ethnic names while doing it. You can squeeze billions out of the ordinary suckers out there, as long as you don't talk like an elitist. And you can let your highly-insured tit flop around America's living rooms all you want, as long as you don't make the NYT use a word like nipple.
The other sort of censorship is harder to spot and much more cruel. It's a matter of which stories get told or noticed in the first place, rather than fussing about the language in which they get told. Put it this way: how many things happened yesterday? and how many of those things made the nightly news? For starters, you probably didn't. Yup, if you're reading the eXile, it's a good bet that nothing you did or ever will do made the news.
Your story is just too depressing. To make the news, your story has to be one of the consoling lies that a culture, any culture, tells itself to make the ordinary suckers' lives seem bearable to them. If your bike is rearended at a stoplight and you spend the rest of your life tetraplegic, it's not going to be on the news. It's a big story to you, and it's the kind of story total strangers enjoy hearing, if only out of morbid curiosity, but it won't make the news. It's too true. It's not an exception.
Tuesday, February 17, 2004
And I thought the situation in the state of Soviet Texas couldn't get any lower, after the "fiscally conservative, small government" republi-commies grew the federal government at rates much larger than the New Gingrich Congress+ William BJ Clinton.
Readers, I was wrong:
I took a look at John Kerry, and before I could even stab him for being a hard core mass murdering commie for the last 30 years, I find out he's a fucking serial killer who killed women and children with his bare hands and then lied and said Uncle Sam made him do it! No wonder the vast majority of Vietnam vets hate his guts. And a fucking SERIAL KILLER! Nominated by the "War is bad because it makes me feel bad" democrats. I was so dumbfounded by this in the last blog entry, that I even forgot to stab John Kerry for being a commie. Man, couldn't the democra-commies find someone who beats up old ladies, or a pervert who likes to fondle little girls? I don't think I can bring myself to vote for a serial killer who is one of the 3 most communist senators in congress for the last 30 years. I mean, I want drunken sailor republi-commie bills vetoed, but at what price? How hypocritical do the democra-commies expect me to be? Ahh, fuck it. Kerry would probably have only vetoed bills that didn't spend enough, anyway.
Here is a good start at describing Kerry's career as a mass murdering communist (helped the north vietnamese kill 100's of thousands of south vietnamese) after his serial killer career. It's so sad. I won't be voting for Kerry - not because he is a commie - but because he is a gigolo lying serial killer. I don't think I can overlook that in my desire for congressional spending bills to be vetoed.
Arkady Volsky used to tell another joke, this one about hope and progress. There were two economists, an optimist and a pessimist. The pessimist said: "Everything is terrible. It can't get any worse."
The optimist said: "Yes, it can."
In the interests of fairness, I want to bring you this story of republican serial killers. This guy was like the top fund raiser for Oregon or Washington and was actively being encouraged to run for office:
Bundy fled east and by mid-January was in sunny Florida, 1,500 miles from chilly Colorado. By now he was another different figure. Bundy was no longer the dapper, mild-mannered Republican who could charm the birds from the trees. He was an unkempt fugitive from justice - living on food stolen from supermarkets - whose murderous urges were out of control.
Republi-commies vs democra-commies! It's like Hitler vs Stalin - who killed more people?!!! Well, I guess W hasn't personally killed anyone yet. Although brown people, Canadians and Frenchies are scared. Good.
So who is responsible for this farce? The American people, of-course.
After Watergate, the American people have demanded more and more of their politicians. Coupled with the rise of dramatic educational and information sharing tools, people are also much more educated and able to choose their own propaganda instead of having it chosen for them. This has resulted in deeper, harder and wetter investigations of politicians. The level of libel and hate propagated by the media (who is prodded with the hot poker of capitalism by the people) at the politicians has caused the average quality of the politician to decline (or maybe even to increase). In any case, a common man can not be a politician any more. This is, of-course, the exact opposite of what the people wanted, when they armed themselves with information age tools to investigate politicians in order to reign them in. As a result, we are ruled by popularly elected smooth talking dictators who can sell ice to Eskimos. And we are all Eskimos. And Texas has been having mighty cold weather these days. One could say its almost filled up with ice. I wonder how that happened? Global "warming", I guess.
In order to increase (or decrease) the quality of politicians even more, I propose we pass a law making it legal to shoot them. Destroying people's reputations with hurtful lies is very bad - sometimes it hurts as much as being killed. So it's just logical for us the people to extend our needs and take the next step to legalize shooting politicians, in order to improve them (or to put them out of their misery). I think that would bring balance back.
Let's face it. Everyone's credibility is shot. Positions on issues don't matter. Character and profession matter. It's Texan Communist Cowboy vs Doctor vs Trial Lawyer vs Gigolo Serial Killer. I would much rather see the politicians described like this:
In a flurry of interviews and national television appearances, Whetstone has painted Gonzalez [her husband] as a control freak who dislikes children and pets, a spendthrift who cannot manage his own financial affairs and a bully with an explosive temper.
Descriptions of politicians, like the one above, are much more preferable than some farcical "position" on farcical "issues".
What a sad day Soviet Texas has come to.
BTW, if you guys want to learn about capitalism as practiced by wig wearing cross dressers, here are some Adam Smith quotes:
"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages..."
"But if great improvements are seldom to be expected from great proprietors, they are least of all to be expected when they employ slaves for their workmen. The experience of all ages and nations, I believe, demonstrates that the work done by slaves, though it appears to cost only their maintenance, is in the end the dearest of any. A person who can acquire no property, can have no other interest but to eat as much, and to labour as little as possible. Whatever work he does beyond what is sufficient to purchase his own maintenance can be squeezed out of him by violence only, and not by any interest of his own. In ancient Italy, how much the cultivation of corn degenerated, how unprofitable it became to the master when it fell under the management of slaves, is remarked by both Pliny and Columella. In the time of Aristotle it had not been much better in ancient Greece..."
"The man whose whole life is spent in performing a few simple operations, of which the effects are perhaps always the same, or very nearly the same, has no occasion to exert his understanding or to exercise his invention in finding out expedients for removing difficulties which never occur. He naturally loses, therefore, the habit of such exertion, and generally becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human creature to become."
Sunday, February 15, 2004
All my republican friends (like John Ashcroft) are telling me we must spit in all ketchup bottles because that mass murdering, flag wrapping, criminal John Kerry is married to a South African slave owner who owns Heinz. It's OK with me. I never liked ketchup much anyway. Also, I guess its OK to burn the flag if Kerry is inside. Also, if Kerry refuses to publicize proof that he has had affairs with interns, then we need to bring out the big guns and get Monica Lewinsky on the job. No one can resist that much corn fed goodness! This time, we can use a red dress, instead of a blue one.
Seriously, Kerry is one fucked up serial killer. He goes to Vietnam and starts shooting up women and children. Then he gets back, blames Uncle Sam for his own criminal mass murder (which was very much out of the ordinary for Vietnam) and proceeds to spend the next 30 years of his life spitting on military men and women, the armed forces, and voting more liberal than Ted Kennedy. He never met private property he didn't want to appropriate for the common good. One would think that he would have learned in Vietnam - that governments shouldn't be allowed to oppress people. Evidently, the communist learned nothing. This is the real John Kerry:
While in command of Swift Boat 44, Kerry and crew operated without prudence in a Free Fire Zone, carelessly firing at targets of opportunity racking up a number of enemy kills and some civilians. His body count included-- a woman, her baby, a 12 year-old boy, an elderly man and several South Vietnamese soldiers.
"It is one of those terrible things, and I'll never forget, ever, the sight of that child," Kerry later said about the dead baby. "But there was nothing that anybody could have done about it. It was the only instance of that happening."
Gee, "nothing"? How about not pulling the trigger? And not blaming Uncle Sam, you Hannibal Lecter.
God, the lying sack of shit (well, truth telling anyway) admitted to being a serial killing war crime committing murderer in public testimony to the US Congress. I wonder how that would play in the kangaroo Hague or the kangaroo UN?
I don't know if John Kerry is worse than W - a Soviet Texan communist cowboy. I'd have to think about it. AFTER I STAB JOHN KERRY. AND HIS FUCKING LIBERAL MEDIA. Liberal media that will never publicize facts like this:
"Thousands of Iranians have visited the holy cities of Najaf and Karbala since the war ended. Many have expressed surprise at the respectful and helpful behavior of the U.S. soldiers they met along the way.
Leila Araki, waiting in the back of a Renault sedan as her husband peddled shoes, recalled that her mother-in-law somehow lost her money on the road to Karbala. She said a U.S. soldier reached into his pocket and handed her taxi
fare back to Najaf.
"This is something quite contrary to what we have been told about Americans," aid Araki, 31, who was told of Americans flashing thumbs-up and saying, "Good, Iranians."
"They were really surprised. I would never be this respected and well-treated even in my country, by my countrymen."
The liberal commucrap media won't report this shit either:
And it was not lost on me that the President spent about thirty seconds shaking hands with the Admiral, CO, and CAG (If you don't know these abbreviations just look them up in your Funk &Wagnalls!) He then spent the next forty-five minutes putting himself at the disposal of the people who make that ship work, the yellow shirts, the green shirts, the purple shirts, the chiefs, the sailors.
If you don't know the significance of those colored shirts, look it up in your Blue Jacket's Manual. Not dressed out in formal uniform (I understand at Bush's request), but in their greasy, smelly, sweaty working uniforms ... working a flight deck is hot, hard work. And yet he, in his flight suit, put himself at their disposal, this was their moment for 19 or 20 something year old kids a few years out of high school, to get a picture of themselves with the President of the United States, his arm draped around their shoulder.
That is a moment that those kids never dreamed would ever happen to them, maybe not even when they knew he was coming aboard. Surely, he would see the brass, not the troops. But it was the troops to whom he gave his time ... and it was the most natural moment in the world. You might have thought it was a family reunion, and in a way, it was...
Yes indeed, what's in it for the media to prove that the democrats are racist assholes? Who would let them show Janet Jackson's boobies on TV then?
To end on a positive note, here is a story of REAL Texan Cowboy asskicking goodness. The upcoming movie Hidalgo is based on a story about a real Texan (not one of those pussy big government drunken sailor republi-commie republican democrats infesting the house and senate):
Old-timers like Frank T. Hopkins, probably the greatest long-distance endurance rider who ever saddled a horse, proved the virtues of the American mustang many times. A former dispatch rider in the United States Army, Hopkins developed his endurance-riding ability carrying dispatches for frontier generals and his horse-handling skill as a specialty rider in the Buffalo Bill wild-west shows. All in all, Hopkins won more than four hundred races in the late 1800's, when endurance riding was the rage, and for most of those rides he was mounted on a mustang.
One of his lengthy rides started at Galveston, Texas, and ended at Rutland, Vermont. He covered the eighteen hundred miles in thirty-one days and finished two full weeks ahead of the rider who came in second. Another of his best performances was made in October, 1893, when he covered approximately one thousand miles from Kansas City, Missouri, to Chicago, Illinois. Hopkins was the only man to complete the grueling ride, which he did in twelve days six hours.
One of the first proponents of the mustang and the Paint Horse, Hopkins became internationally known not only for setting unbeatable records in endurance racing but also for the excellent quality of the horses he rode. His ranch in Wyoming Territory was the home of a number of good western-type stock horses and one outstanding Paint Horse, Hidalgo. Described as a cream-and-white Paint Horse, Hidalgo was bred on a Sioux Indian reservation in South Dakota. Since he came into the world before the days of pedigrees and family lines, it can only be assumed that he was of "western stockhorse blood," and was descended from horses brought to this continent by the Spanish conquistadors. He was known as an American mustang and possessed the indefatigable endurance typical of the breed. Hopkins obtained the young Paint from the Sioux about 1882 and owned him until 1890.
At the World's Fair in Paris in l889, Hopkins was approached by Rau Rasmussen, a freighter who dominated most of the trade from Aden to Gaza, to enter his Paint Mustang in a three-thousand-mile endurance race across the Arabian desert. Rasmussen had heard of the American mustangs' hardiness and asked Hopkins if he would be willing to pit one of his best against prized Arabian horses. Hopkins accepted the challenge. The desert endurance race was a true test of a horse's strength and stamina. To be able to complete the course, a horse must have a healthy constitution, incredible power, a staunch spirit, strong legs, and sure steps. Beginning in Aden, in southern Arabia, the course followed the Persian Gulf and then turned inland over the barren sandy land along the borders of Arabia, Iraq, and Syria.
The contest had been held annually for a thousand years, and in the past had always been won by an Arab horse. In the words of Anthony A. Amaral, writing of this famous race:
Slightly over one hundred horses started on the ride from Aden. The great caravan of skilled Arabian riders rode their most prized mounts. They were spirited, accustomed to the difficulty of the sands, accustomed to the sun that sprayed exhausting heat upon them. Even among the mass of mounted horsemen, Hopkins stood out with parti-colored, 950 pound Hidalgo from the American plains.
Hopkins held Hidalgo at a steady pace as they made their way through the dry heat and over sandy soil. The march progressed to the Persian Gulf and up toward Syria and then along the border of Iraq and Arabia. Each day the riders started with the sun, following it until they were marching into it. Horses dropped by the way, some exhausted, some lame. At the end of the first week, the scarcity of water and the meager diet the horses were forced to exist upon in the barren country had culled the inadequate horses. The strung line of riders dwindled daily.
Entering the second week of the grueling trek, Hopkins made his move and started to pass the other desert riders. In the wake of the sand kicked up by Hidalgo, treasured Arabian horses of the Bedouins fell farther and farther behind, while Hidalgo kept to a steady pace.
On the sixty-eighth day of the ride Hopkins rode Hidalgo to the finish stone, leaving behind him three thousand scorching miles.
The tough Paint Mustang was the winner by thirty-three hours over his nearest competitor. The only American Paint Horse in the history of Arabian endurance racing ever to win the historic race, Hidalgo did it, and did it on merit.
Wednesday, February 11, 2004
God Damn Commies in Commiechussetts trying to prevent Ted Kennedy from gay marrying George Bush! This outrage will not stand! Ted Kennedy shall be forcibly married to W immediately and forced to have many many children!
Stalin brought the ideal of communism to everyone by killing the people that were happy or productive or odd looking.
Bad commie thinks this was an excellent plan, but that it does not go far enough. Bad Commie will bring communism to the communists by stabbing everyone who is unhappy, unproductive or normal looking. Because an unhappy communist is a communist that is not living up to his full potential! I notice that commiechussetts legislators seem particularly unhappy these days. When Bad Commie stabs them all, it will be like big fish gift from heaven to everyone. That is what those bastards get for denying Ted Kennedy his constitutional right to happily marry George Bush.
You may be wondering why Bad Commie goes on stabbing sprees all the time. Out of LOVE, of-course (possibly gay). Beautiful spiritual commie love. I anticipate the desires of my commie masters. They do not need to tell me what to do or to force me to do anything! I naturally want to please them. And I know they will be most pleased when I improve the commie gene pool by stabbing commies! Bad Commie is very happy to stab more than his fair share of communists!
By the grace of holy Texan cowboy president W, it shall be so! ALL COMMIES SHALL BE STABBED. Not fed like this:
controversial "speed-feeding" method in which grain is streamed through a pipe inserted down the throat of a duck or goose for weeks at a time toward the end of their lives
STABBED. No Commie shall be fed. Bad Commie will not jump through hoops to satisfy petty bureaucrats.
BAD COMMIE WILL SPEED STAB THEM.
And what does the constitution really say about Ted Kennedy gay marrying W?
Inasmuch as the [U.S.] Constitution was never signed, nor agreed to, by anybody, as a contract, and therefore never bound anybody, and is now binding upon nobody; and is, moreover, such an one as no people can ever hereafter be expected to consent to, except as they may be forced to do so at the point of the bayonet, it is perhaps of no importance what its true legal meaning, as a contract, is. Nevertheless, the writer thinks it proper to say that, in his opinion, the Constitution is no such instrument as it has generally been assumed to be; but that by false interpretations, and naked usurpations, the government has been made in practice a very widely, and almost wholly, different thing from what the Constitution itself purports to authorize. He has heretofore written much, and could write much more, to prove that such is the truth. But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain--that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. --Lysander Spooner, 'No Treason'.
That's right! Stab the Commietution! Strive to emulate Osama bin Texan:
I will dream of happy hard working kulak amish russians making pelmeni and smoked fish, secure and safe in the knowledge that the Great Texan Cowboy Putin will arrest anyone who robs or attacks them. --Osama bin Texan
P.S. Arguing over gay marriage (of Ted kennedy and George "W Bush") is like arguing with your dog over whether to vote libertarian, or the Dog party.
Saturday, February 07, 2004
It's amazing how the current WMD situation is exactly like the propaganda wars of WW2:
The Hitlers (republi-commies) are like: "We must hunt down and kill the evil Jew (WMD)".
The Americans (democra-commies) are like "What Jew, look there is no Jew! And if there was, he's not so evil! A threat to no one!".
Meanwhile, the Jew is like "How the fuck am I different from anyone else? I just wanted to convert Germany to socialism(i.e Gas Kurds) in peace. Why won't these fuckers leave me alone?".
OK, that was stupid.
Anyway, people who use the word "WMD" are all just repeating commie propaganda (from the democra-commie but also from the republi-commie mouthpieces). A simple hand gun is a WMD. A regular explosive missile is a WMD. Any battlefield weapon is a WMD. Weapon - check, of - check, Mass - check, Destruction - check. Let's say you don't believe me. Let's say you think scary chemical WMD have some extra military value - Well, explosives are chemical you stooooooooopid moron. Maybe you think WMD are especially destructive or somehow more long term? Ummm - no. A shell or normal missile is just as destructive. (Heard of depleted uranium, BTW? Heard of LAND MINES? Heard of injuries? Do those sound long-term to you?) Maybe you think WMDs are more scary than regular weapons. Oh please. Try playing russian roulette. Try being an Israeli attacked by scuds and homocide bombers.
So, let's see. They are not more scary, they can't kill any better (in fact much worse than modern computer weapons), they are not more long term. They have exactly the same military value. Hmmm. Feeling stupid yet?
Maybe WMD are a threat to the State of the United States? Oh, please. Box cutters and mass transit (airplanes) are a threat. A stove that can cook beans is a threat. An ignorant brainwashed and unarmed populace looking for handouts is a threat.
Weapons that rapidly decompose and lose value are not a threat to anybody - particularly not to a state, and its army, and it massive isolated homeland. You think Iraq the state could have transported a million soldiers armed with WMD (or any other weapon) across the world? What nonsense. Giving $10 dollars to a terrorist to buy a gun is more of a threat than giving him a recipe for how to cook beans.
MONEY FOR OIL THAT WE GIVE TO IRAQ IS THE REAL THREAT.
That money, when used to purchase one-use big bombs(conventional, satellite laser, dirty radiation, etc) from the west itself is a little threatening. But not really. Firstly, because as 9/11 showed - money is not needed at all. Secondly, because as soon as Iraq drops the first bomb on the US homeland, the whole country of Iraq becomes a nuclear crater. So the state of Iraq simply can not threaten the State of the US in a military manner. About the worst iraq can do is selectively sell its oil to countries that promise not to resell to all the countries of the west. And even that is not so bad.
So, why have you been made a slave to this propaganda by your commie masters?
Well, the democra-commies wanted to find a kind of a weapon that they knew Iraq never had, and then accuse republicans of invading to get rid of that weapon, all so they could have political gain when they demonstrate the weapon did not exist. Furthermore, the WMD term is continuously redefined by the democrats to be whatever the common concept is of things that Iraq never had. As soon as it's reported that Iraq had something (ricin, prohibited missiles), or had the capability to rapidly make it (which is actually how you "store" wmd), they redefine the WMD term again to exclude that.
The republi-commies are content to let the democra-commies talk about WMD because they think they can win the propaganda war and scare the American people into doing anything by showing them repeated pictures of 9-11. Of course, they should be showing pictures of walmart + 9/11. Because all you need to cause another 9/11 is walmart.
And, of-course, the media likes WMDs because they are cool and get ratings.
Result - you have been brainwashed and the commie masters win.
And all of this, when there is no physical thing like democrat WMD. There is no way to define WMD in terms of military capabilities, while at the same time excluding "conventional" weapons from meeting that definition. God, you people are stupid. I'm stupid too, but crazy good commie stabbing stupid.
We should just do politics like this: http://smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurve/index.cfm?story=20040130 and stop trying to relate it to the real world.
The only thing more stupid than politics, is the politics of Janet Jackson's middle aged breast. And here too.
Fucking Busheviks, all of you. Repibli-commie and democra-commie alike. Only IRAQ is really the UNITED STATES.
I'm going to go read about the "World Commie Forum" so I can get my stab on. People who participate in politics are pissing me off.
"A man is none the less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new
master once in a term of years. Neither are a people any the less slaves
because they are permitted periodically to choose new masters. What makes
them slaves is the fact that they are now, and are always hereafter to be,
in the hands of men whose power over them is, and always is to be, absolute
and irresponsible." --Lysander Spooner, 'No Treason'.
Monday, February 02, 2004
A coalition of intoxication-prone Naval personnel today
launched a "drunken sailor pride" offensive to combat the
scurrilous comparisons between their tame entertainment
habits, and the wanton spend-thrift orgy of fiscal felony
begat by the current Republican led Congress. Spokesperson
Ian Schitphazed call the media's caricature of Republican
misconduct to be wholly without precedence among our
valiant service men and women. "While we do have a
reputation to uphold, mind you that we are a very honest
family-oriented crowd. Why wez never drink more than we
can pay for out of *ourz* own pockets! But your average
Congressman, he acts like hez three sheets to the wind,
and on somebody else's dime, he's buying rounds for folks
that ain't born yet!!"
In a news conference, which happened to include a cameo
appearance of a leading Democrat, Senator Ted Kennedy
remarked, "Y'know, I am truly impressed. If I didn't knows
better, I'd swear these guys are all liberals from Massachusetts.
I have never before seen such fiscal irresponsibility in a
Republican. Of course, they never occupied the executive
and legislative branches at the same time, so who'da thunkit?
Maybe I should change my par . . . eh, never mind. Where's
the chowdda and the broads?"
Yes, that's right. Congress has decided that it wants to make laws that stop others from lying cheating and stealing, while it gets to engage in the selfsame IRU like behavior with absolute utter impunity.
Look, someone has to say it. Vicious republi-commies have infiltrated the State of Soviet Texas. In the process of their infiltration, they have tarnished the image of the Cowboy and the Texan. Crimes which deserve a SWIFT and IMMEDIATE hanging. "Get the rope", as Texans would say. Now, I've noticed that some of you weak minded fools babble on about how democrats are bigger commies - Oooh! Scary democra-commies are scary boogie-commies! All I have to say to that is: "Get a grip you weak minded fools, OR I WILL GET THE ROPE!". As soon as a communist (or anyone else) gets in power he starts talking about the evils of communism and how he is just so much better then the alternative. Well, the republicans control the House, the Senate, and the Presidency. Any dissatisfaction with federal government falls squarely on THEIR shoulders. The democra-commies are like homeless crack smoking monkeys. They have no bearing on federal government whatsoever. When a republi-commie walks into the room, the reporters should immediately beat the democra-commie-monkey and tell it to shut up. A real REPUBLICAN is in the room - a person who actually gets to make decisions. Do the reporters ask homeless crack addicts about their opinions on federal government? NO THEY DO NOT. Because homeless crack addicts are NOT IN POWER. EXACTLY LIKE THE DEMOCRA-COMMIES are not in power. They have zero relevance. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Furthermore, I notice that people say republi-commies are more fiscally conservative than democra-commies. What utter disgusting bullshit. Where does the penny pinching Jew live? In New York, that's where! And is this penny pinching Jew fiscally conservative? YES HE IS. AND HE VOTES FOR DEMOCRA-COMMIES. Furthermore, it is ludicrous to say that a republi-commie, who passes a health care bill that randomly distributes money to big businesses, for those same businesses to perform no specific task, is somehow more efficient at spending money to achieve a purpose (or more "fiscally conservative") than a democra-commie who gives the money to businesses, in return for those businesses providing accountable health care. Now, I'm not saying that I can foresee the future and what democra-commies will decide to do. But I am saying that people who support republi-commies are idiots.
Also, I have noticed that this is an election year. This means that both parties attempt to use the president as cover for the acts of congress - to be specific, not unnatural sexual acts, but congress' responsibility to pass laws and steal money.
I WILL NOT HAVE THE GREAT TEXAN AND COWBOY W sold down the river for the sake of either party!
It will not stand! No more scurrilous lies!
The nerve of these congressmen! Trying to use W as cover for their evil commie acts!
And the ULTIMATE responsibility rests with THE POPULACE. Which elected REPUBLICAN senators and house members.
So, for the sake of the great nation of Texas (and not the puny tiny state of Soviet Texas that is HALF the size of Alaska that exists today):
"We must invade Soviet Texas, kill its communist leaders and convert them to Capitalism. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war".
That's the way the commie spy Ann Coulter said it, and that's the way I'm saying it.
And that's the honest truth.
Sunday, February 01, 2004
Awesome Bad Commie Capitalist Stabbers!
I thought I’d put together a page of some things I love, so I went on a stealing spree and stole pictures of those things!
Deryk Munroe, www.dcmunroeknives.com, www.bladegallery.com
Carel Smith, www.bladegallery.com, The Knifemakers' Guild of Southern Africa :
Rick Dunkerley, www.bladegallery.com :
Barry Gallagher, www.gallagherknives.com, www.bladegallery.com :
Shane Taylor, www.taylorknives.com, www.bladegallery.com :
Scott Slobodian, www.slobodianswords.com :
Joe Olson, www.bladegallery.com :
Johan Gustafsson: www.johanknives.com, www.bladegallery.com :
If you want to learn more about stabbers, I recommend: www.knifeart.com and www.bladegallery.com
I also have a book called “Knives 2003”.
This seems to be a good directory: www.worldknifedb.net
P.S. Everything shown above is really a pen, not a knife!
Perfect for stabbing republi-commies and boogie-commies! Happy stabbing!