helping commies get to know knives
Tuesday, December 30, 2003
The stabbing of the vicious commie "mother earth" is on schedule. We are making good progress in stabbing through the commie crust!
The capitalist Chinese, in particular, are busy with a vicious attack on the mass murdering bitch "mother earth". I salute them and hope the commies in the Chinese government let them proceed with the destruction of the commie crust.
As well as Mother Earth's direct acts of hideous mass murder, her followers are also to be feared. The commie spies belonging to "Mother earth" are greatly energized by her campaign of terror and socialist mass murder in Bam (Iran) and are completely out of control as shown in this manifesto:
What's at stake? While aspiring terrorists with tofu breath build nail bombs and play with matches, the best and brightest scientists around the world are forging miraculous breakthroughs that will benefit all mankind -- and especially the poor in underdeveloped nations that the leftists and Luddites claim to care about so much.
Science journalist Michael Fumento comprehensively documents such stunning developments in his eye-opening new book, "Bioevolution: How Biotechnology Is Changing Our World." It's an invaluable antidote to the irrational hysteria of eco-terrorists. Fumento reports on how agricultural biotech researchers are refining methods of pumping up protein levels in corn, boosting vitamin levels in a wide variety of crops, making crops resistant to the cold, and finding ways to accelerate the growth of cotton, potatoes and tomatoes. They've developed a process called "gene silencing" to fight bacterial diseases that can devastate fruit and nut harvests and have even come up with a potato plant that glows green when it's thirsty.
I am so devastated by the recent Bam earthquake socialist atrocity committed by Mother Earth that I may have to adopt some of Ann Coulter's commie spy tactics in order to make sure Mother Earth gets the vicious stabbing she so richly deserves. Here is the strategy of the commie spy Ann Coulter:
Apparently, this is what liberals mean by "a plan":
Military setback: Appeal to the French.
Military victory: Appeal to the French.
Saddam captured: Appeal to the French.
Osama captured: Appeal to the French.
Osama catches Saddam: Appeal to the French.
I have learned from this strategy and, instead of appealing to the french, my strategy will be to stab commies. Yes, its the same as the old strategy. I don't care. In my view there is the knife, the other knife, and there are unstabbed commies (like Mother Earth). Any more stupid questions, Commie Lovers?
Some of my fellow commie stabbers may be getting discouraged due to doomsday propaganda like this:
It is true, however, that America was once a place of substantial intergenerational mobility: Sons often did much better than their fathers. A classic 1978 survey found that among adult men whose fathers were in the bottom 25 percent of the population as ranked by social and economic status, 23 percent had made it into the top 25 percent. In other words, during the first thirty years or so after World War II, the American dream of upward mobility was a real experience for many people.
Now for the shocker: The Business Week piece cites a new survey of today's adult men, which finds that this number has dropped to only 10 percent. That is, over the past generation upward mobility has fallen drastically. Very few children of the lower class are making their way to even moderate affluence. This goes along with other studies indicating that rags-to-riches stories have become vanishingly rare, and that the correlation between fathers' and sons' incomes has risen in recent decades. In modern America, it seems, you're quite likely to stay in the social and economic class into which you were born.
Goodbye, Horatio Alger. And goodbye, American Dream.
However, I think Paul Krugman, the author of that drivel above, never had an American Dream in the first place. This is of no concern to me. I feel equally secure that I can fulfill my American Dream of stabbing commies no matter what class I am, so his whole premise that what commies think of me is the basis of my happiness is false. I stab commies, and that's the way I like it. DIE COMMIES DIE! STAB STAB STAB STAB STAB STAB.
Hope that did it.
I'm a little confused by this article by Noam Chomsky. I can't tell if he is a commie or not. I think he is deliberately disguising his nature, therefore I can only assume he is a commie and I shall stab him for Bad Commie Security reasons which take priority over any National Security nonsense.
Today I leave you with these quotes by George S Patton:
"Americans love to fight. All real Americans love the sting of battle." -- George S. Patton
(After being told by Omar Bradley that the Russians were going to be allowed to occupy Prague in order to avoid "complications") "For God's sake Brad, it seems to me that a great nation like America should let others worry about the complications." -- George S. Patton
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country". -- George S. Patton
"We are going to kill German bastards. I would prefer to skin them alive, but gentlemen, I fear some of our people at home would accuse me of being too rough." -- George S. Patton
"Many of you have in your veins German and Italian blood. But remember that these ancestors of yours so loved freedom that they gave up home and country to cross the ocean in search of liberty. The ancestors of the people we shall kill lacked the courage to make such a sacrifice and remained slaves." -- George S. Patton
"Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-bitch Hitler just like I'd shoot a snake". -- George S. Patton
"Watch what people are cynical about, and one can often discover what they lack." -- George S. Patton
[NOTE: The first idiot to suggest that I lack communism will be stabbed]
Monday, December 29, 2003
Look at this. Just look at these pictures:
WHO PERPETRATED THIS TERRORIST COMMIE EARTHQUAKE ATTACK IN BAM?
WHICH LUNATIC MASS MURDERER DID THIS?
This was done by the mass murdering commie called "Mother Earth" and her foot soldiers like the "Sierra Club" and GreenPeace.
This is the mass murderer who constantly performs terrifying and soul shaking terrorist attacks orders of magnitude greater than 9/11:
This violent homicidal commie Mother Earth, shown above, shall not go unstabbed one second longer! I am stabbing it right now! Stab it with me and we shall puncture its commie crust! We shall kill this homicidal commie, or failing that, pave EVERY SINGLE INCH (particularly the cute animals) over with cement!
We need to nuke this commie immediately! No more murder! Ever!
No More! No more shall we tolerate this constant mass murder in the name of socialism! Do you realize that this mass murderer also "supports palestinians" just like Saddam?
(disclaimer: also "supports" all other forms of life)
Thursday, December 25, 2003
It's Christmas time, and that means extra stabbing for all commies!
I wonder what is the "utility" of the gift of stabbing I plan to give to the commies? Does my gift give them wealth? Did I have to labor a long time to provide this gift?
Let us ponder the question of gift giving. Economists say:
Gift giving is irrational - unless, perhaps, you are hedging your bets, says Ross Gittins.
It's a little-known fact that the first economic rationalist was Ebenezer Scrooge. That's because economists simply can't understand why people would do something as stupid as giving presents at Christmas.
Conventional economics teaches that gift giving is irrational. The satisfaction or "utility" a person derives from consumption is determined by their personal preferences. But no one understands your preferences as well as you do.
So when I give up $50 worth of utility to buy a present for you, the chances are high that you'll value it at less than $50. If so, there's been a mutual loss of utility. The transaction has been inefficient and "welfare reducing", thus making it irrational. As an economist would put it, "unless a gift that costs the giver p dollars exactly matches the way in which the recipient would have spent the p dollars, the gift is suboptimal".
Dear readers! This is pure unadulterated slander! I want you to know that all my large and sharp knives are of the highest quality! No knife is "suboptimal", the nerve of the econocommies to even suggest such a thing! My gift of stabbing to the commies is optimal - perfection itself.
Suboptimal! Who would be so twisted as to suggest that any commie stabbing I perform is suboptimal?! The value of every stabbing I provide is infinite!
This is almost as ridiculous as suggesting that Christmas is really the birthday of "pagan 'gods' born on Dec. 25th are: Hercules, the son of Zeus (Greeks) Bacchus, god of wind, (Romans),Adenis god of Greeks Freyr the Greek-Roman god."
Or that Christmas is a holiday invented by German immigrants who liked to tree worship.
[Note to self, THIS SOUNDS LIKE HIPPIES]
Or as ridiculous as this explanation of Russian Christmas:
Many other religious and folk traditions were suppressed during the communist era. Before the revolution, a figure called Babouschka would bring gifts for the children. Like Italy's La Befana, the story is that Babouschka failed to give food and shelter to the three wise men during their journey to visit the Christ Child. According to tradition, she still roams the countryside searching for the Christ Child and visiting the homes of children during the Christmas season. Babouschka never completely disappeared, and now in the post-communist era, has returned openly. Christmas trees were also banned by the Communist regime and were replaced by "New Year's" trees.
Completely ridiculous. I know that the proper purpose of Christmas is to stab commies, just like the purpose of all holidays.
Speaking of slander, the fat German millionaire hypocrite commie Michael Moore has been asking where his country is. Evidently he can't find it on the map. Anyway, I would be happy to show him were he is on any map, circle the location, write commie next to it, and then stab him.
Evidently, FrontPage Magazine thinks he is Germany:
Americans vote Republican, contrary to their own self-interest, writes Moore, because wealthy capitalist oil men have hypnotized them with an illegitimate war in Iraq, fear of terrorists, and a few crumbs from a tax cut (given mostly to the wealthy) that feeds the American Horatio Alger myth that we all can succeed.
"Horatio Alger Must Die," writes Moore. Americans should stop trying to become rich. Instead they should desert the War on Terror and enlist in the Class War. Our best chance for a halfway pleasant life, he argues, is to tax all wealth away from the rich and redistribute it to ourselves in the form of welfare, government healthcare and other benefits.
The good news for Michael Moore is that he can now answer his own question: "Dude, Where's My Country?" Weeks ago he toured five cities and was greeted everywhere with huge standing-room-only crowds of young people who cheered wildly at his every word as if he were a rock star or movie idol.
"We are socialists," a similar idol who shares Moore's politics told just such a cheering crowd in one of these cities. "We are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."
Michael Moore's country, where these adoring crowds cheered him wildly last month, was Germany.
It doubtless helped that Moore dressed in a brown jacket reminiscent of the brown garb of that other idol who like Moore swayed and hypnotized crowds of America-hating Leftist young people.
"I thought it was almost like a kind of cult," said truck driver Max Klemmt after watching Moore spew his anti-American venom in Berlin. "He says somebody is crap and everyone cheers."
The other idol and cult leader whose socialist politics closely parallel Moore's was the head of the Nazionalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei, the National Socialist German Worker's Party usually referred to in its abbreviated form, Nazi. The Moore-like attack on capitalism was made by Adolf Hitler in a speech on May 1, 1927. To read other such Hitler quotes and learn more about Hitler's Leftist socialist politics, click here.
Germany today has a population of about 84 million, only 28 percent that of the United States. Michael Moore's previous best-seller, Stupid White Men, came out with a total of only a million copies in the United States, but in Germany with scarcely a quarter of our population the same book sold 1.2 million copies. His new book, published with a German title that translates "Full Cover, Mr. Bush," reported the November 17 Wall Street Journal, had a huge initial print run in Germany of 200,000 copies, with more to come.
(In Germany, as the September 29th Wall Street Journal reported, every kind of crackpot anti-American conspiracy book ? like the Andreas von Bulow tome alleging, Howard-Deanlike, that President Bush was somehow involved in or had foreknowledge of 9-11 ? nowadays sells like hotcakes.)
So, Michael, you need never again ask "Dude, Where's My Country?"
You found it, amid the sweaty torchlight parades, beer halls, swastikas, brown shirt socialists, goose-steppers and hypnotized screaming crowds of freedom-hating, America-hating former East Germans too young and uneducated to remember the nightmare into which the last socialist demagogue like yourself led their blinkered culture. Welcome to the cabaret, Michael Moore. Welcome home to your true country.
Too bad they impose confiscatory taxes on rich folks like you. But what's sauce for the goose-stepper is sauce for the gander. This is what you want for all of us.
Heh. Now that's what you call a optimal stabbing. Pretty easy though. Moore's so fat from eating capitalist steak that he can't even move. And I mean that literally.
Speaking of commies with multiple stab wounds, the commie Slate Magazine has tried to do a poor Allah imitation and attempt to get the Dean Commie to fight in the right direction:
Dean's jihad is even crazier than Gore's. It's almost completely undisciplined. Three weeks ago on a national radio show, Dean brought up the "interesting theory" that Bush had been warned beforehand about 9/11. Last week, Dean defended that remark by telling reporters, "I acknowledged that I did not believe the theory I was putting out." When the Washington Post exposed several Dean comments that didn't fit the facts, Dean scoffed that voters could believe him "or they can believe the Washington Post." No word yet on whether voters must choose between believing Dean and believing the Los Angeles Times, which issued a similar analysis of Dean's whoppers last Thursday.
Here's a hint, Slate Commies. If you want to tell Dean how to run his jihad, get Jacque Chiraq to issue a fatwa.
Or maybe Dean can adopt the same strategy against Bush that he wanted us to adopt against Saddam:
First we'll coax Saddam out of his bunker with a trail of delicious candy. Then, once his belly is full and he's all sleepy and happy, we'll calmly explain that we don't approve of what he's been doing and it's not very nice and we wish he'd stop. And he'll be like, "Whoa, I never thought of it that way. You guys are my friends! I like you!" And then everybody will hug and cry, and then get a little embarrassed about crying, and then make some jokes to cover up being embarrassed. And then a beautiful rainbow will appear, and a shy unicorn will walk down it, and Saddam will ride it to the North Pole, and he'll spend the rest of his life helping Santa make wonderful toys for all the good little girls and boys, and there'll be hot chocolate, and, and, and nobody will ever ever die again for any reason ever. -- Jim Treacher
In happier news, The Colonel gets some advice from RWN on how to torture himself.
And Bush is having way too much fun as president again:
Constant 'Joke' Calls From White House Putting Further Strain On Relations Between US And UN
Merry Christmas, and I hope you like my present, commies!
Tuesday, December 23, 2003
Stabbed Commie Allah has another terrorist comic making fun of commies. I gotta say that my favorite is when John Kerry ponders how he is going to relate to the common folk:
John Kerry: "Ah, Le proletariate Americain. At last we meet, tell me, how shall I charm you, hm? Shall we banter about la femme? Shall we share un anecodote de sports? Or perhaps--"
Rednecks: "That dude looks like a big Q-Tip"
That truly is very funny, stabbed commie Allah. I'm unsticking the knife from you right now to see if you do anything else interesting! Truly, blogs are the coffee houses and drawing rooms of the modern age!
Politics is not all fun and games, thought. The commieness of The Kerry-Bush-Dean Terrorist Triangle is nothing compared to the axis of evil in congress. Check out the opinions of a typical congress person on some subjects of the day:
The EPA: "The Gestapo of government, purely and simply."
Global warming: "It is the arrogance of man to think that man can change the climate of the world. Only nature can change the climate. A volcano, for instance."
The Nobel Prize Committee: "Swedish environmental extremists."
The problems of fish kills caused by acid rain: "Just sprinkle a little lime to neutralize the acid."
Congressional pay raises (five in the last five years): "I challenge anyone to live on my salary" [$158,000 a year].
Leaving 12 million poor children out of the tax credit for families with children: "There are a lot of things more important than that."
After attending a round of golf and a fundraiser hosted by the owners of notorious sweatshops in Saipan: "I didn't see anyone sweating."
Launching a GOP task force to browbeat judges who fail to toe his ideological line: "Today, we in the House are putting America's judges on alert: We are watching you."
When asked to put out his cigar by a Washington restaurant owner who noted that the federal government prohibited it: "I am the federal government."
Hi Ho, Hi Ho, its off to stab I go! Merry Stabbing Christmas, Tom Delay!
In other news, Lybia's Colonel Quadafi has been in the news lately pontificating about how he will let W fondle his manly smooth weapons. Is that gay or what? W seems to be for the fondling, though.
All this talk of Lybia made me think: why is their leader called "colonel" ? Well, it turns out that:
Qaddafi insists, in Libya's utopian society, the people rule, so he needs no grandiose title.
Of course, it was Capt. Qaddafi who took power in 1969 via a coup, at the impressively young age of 27. He immediately upped his rank to colonel. But he also ordered the creation of a revolutionary state in which the people would rule themselves and neither executive nor legislative branches would be needed. Presenting what he called "the final solution to the problem of the instrument of governing,"
Qaddafi explained the idea in his "Green Book" manifesto: "Parliaments have been a legal barrier between the peoples and the exercise of authority. This is an obsolete theory and an outdated experience." As an alternative, Qaddafi offered up his "happy discovery of the way to direct democracy"; Libyan citizens would rule via a series of popular congresses and committees.
This actually sounds pretty good. Looking at Qaddafi's actual real blog, he is very reasonable. He says:
Therefore, we should completely distinguish between what is under preparation actually against Afghanistan; as it appears as a direct result from what has happened in the form of dreadful act on the day 9/11 and fighting terrorism at the world level.
The first is the U.S responsibility, and the second is the world responsibility .. there is no excuse for non cooperating, and or non-allying for the second subject, e.g fighting terrorism, if we agree about itÂs identification, and reasons.
Delaying or non making it make us neglect humanity future, and disappoint next generations.
Wow. Pretty astute of him.
Interestingly enough, the other dead horse that the west likes to beat - Vladimir Putin - is making statements like this:
The state now has to provide rights and freedoms for its citizens. Nothing at all can be done without this. Strengthening democracy has an applicable value for Russia.
Nothing can also be done without effective economic development. There"s plan for raising people incomes, pensions, wages and overall economy development rate is to rise. But we need to support basis things. We have to go on with tax reform, lower the taxation burden. Value-added tax will be lowered by 2%, the trade tax of 5% will be fully abolished.
Why is Putin so much less of a commie that the Bush-Dean Axis of Evil, huh?
And why are the preciousssss Russiansses more capitalist and funny than the Amerikanski Pig Dogs? Why do they know that the wallet votes by staying at home, while we don't?
Tune in later this week when I shall answer all these questions, and more, by violently and viciously stabbing commies.
Monday, December 22, 2003
Was Osama bin Texan wrong about the republicrats being commies? Star Parker says that:
America has two economic systems: capitalism for the rich and socialism for the poor. This double-minded approach seems to keep the poor enslaved to poverty while the rich get richer. Let's face it, despite its $400 billion price tag, welfare isn't working.
The solution is a faith-based, not state-sponsored, plan. In Uncle Sam's Plantation, she offers five simple yet profound steps that will allow the nation's poor to go from entitlement and slavery to empowerment and freedom. Parker shares her own amazing journey up from the lower rungs of the economic system and addresses the importance of extending the free market system to this neglected group of people. Emphasizing personal initiative, faith, and responsibility, she walks readers toward releasing the hold poverty has over their lives.
So, poor people are commies, while rich people are capitalist pig dogs? What's in it for me to debunk this terrorist lie?
Lets have a go:
Receive stolen money (the only kind of money the government has) from the government.
Some are addicted to money gotten without working, some are not.
Relationship with government: Short term beneficiaries of Communism (government is communism).
Hard working immigrants (not socialist trash) sometimes transition to being rich.
Stupid rich people become poor.
Have their money stolen by the government.
All are addicted to money gotten without working.
Relationship with government: Long and Short Term victims of Communism
Stupid rich people become poor.
Hard working immigrants sometimes transition to being rich.
So, looking at this ecosystem, people who are genetically or culturally disposed to be lazy and stupid end up poor. People who do not have both of those traits are distributed among both groups.
People who are both hard working and smart are rich.
In so far as the democratic or republican party chooses to represent the non changing pool of lazy stupid, they are a communist party.
In so far as the democratic or republican party chooses to represent the non changing pool of hardworking smart, they are a capitalist party.
A) The party that chooses to represent the poor politically benefits from people undergoing the rich -> poor transition and also benefits from people not being able to take the poor->rich transition. This would be the communist party.
B) The party that chooses to represent the rich politically benefits from the poor->rich transition and is harmed by the rich->poor transition. This would be the capitalist party.
Parties that attempt to intially straddle the two pools(rich and poor) and attempt to straddle the 2 state transitions between the pools will naturally evolve towards one of the party stable states(A,B) described above.
Take That Osama Bin Texan!
In a two party system, both parties can't be commies! I just proved it with teh anti commie math.
Now, which party is which?....
On other news, The Commie Onion reports that:
Communists Now Least Threatening Group In U.S.
WASHINGTON, DC—According to a report released Tuesday by the Pentagon, Communists rank last on a list of 238 threats to national security. "Communists may now safely be ignored," Secretary of Defense William Cohen said. "The Red Menace has been surpassed by militia groups, religious extremists, ecoterrorists, cybercriminals, Hollywood producers, and angry drivers." Other groups deemed more threatening than Communists include rap-metal bands (#96), escaped zoo animals (#202), and Belgians (#237).
I just stabbed all the onions in my fridge. It is the onions that are crying now!
This is almost as bad humor as Gandalf the Unilateral by the Politburo:
His illegal, immoral invasion of Mordor was typical. He is "all hat and no magic," so arrogant riding on big white horse. Who he think he is? Never bothered to get authorization from White Council for his war on Mordor.* Never even tried to get Sarumance on board. And Sarumance ended up vetoing his plan at the White Council.
Friday, December 19, 2003
To Stab or Not To Stab the Bush Commie?
Lately, I've been having highly disturbing tendencies that made me feel all funny inside. It's very troubling. I was so impressed with the way the soldiers of the W commie heroically captured the Sadaam commie, that I've been thinking, that maybe, just maybe I shouldn't stab W for being a commie.
There, I've said it. Now you know my deep dark secret.
BTW, did you know that the Sadaam commie was not actually hiding in a spiderhole, but hiding in a septic tank? Cool, huh?
Anyway, back to the stabbing of the Bush commie. Its horrible to think that I could let one, even one, just one commie go unstabbed. To solve my severe mental problem of letting just one commie escape the knife, I attempted to convince Osama bin Texan that W should not be stabbed by sending him the link to the Orson Scott Card (who is a democrat) article calling democrats traitors. The conversation follows:
[Osama bin Texan is talking about the Orson Scott Card article.
Notice how I've made his words display in evil commie red.]
Not only did he keep harping on the Iraq -> 9/11 thing, which even the conservatives have abandoned, he also tried to get Syria -> 9/11, and a bunch of other ones.
His whole basic premise was "Democrats can't be for America and against the War on Terrorism at the same time." However, he apparently failed to notice that the Bush administration has no intention of devoting significant resources to anti-terrorism. Aside from dabbling in Afghanistan a bit, most of what they do that is "anti-terrorism" is designed to make morons feel safe, not create safety, and any strategy which has it's main cost on you and me instead of interfering with the administration's other goals, is going to be selected.
Orson Card seems to have missed the fact that Wolfowitz & Co. have already had to abandon many of those lies.
The fact is, those lies worked because there were a lot of people out there like Card, who wanted to believe them. It was the version of facts they immediately gravitated to. I think they wanted to be involved in a big project to hunt down some shadowy conspiracy of ultimate evil, so they just invented it.
[This made me very very mad. Osama bin Texan, the Texan
(I wanted to use a stronger word than terrorist, and I did)
was not cooperating.]
ObT, there is a very big link between instability in the middle east and terrorism. You need to think more strategically. Have you perhaps noticed that all the terrorist are Arabs? And that all Arabs hate the US and Jews ? And that the leader of the hate America and hate Jews faction is Saddam? A person who is thinking strategically would draw certain conclusions, given those facts....
Certain conclusions about root causes.....
The fact that you refuse to draw those conclusions is merely a statement saying you want to stick your head in the sand. Bin Laden is one man.....
Wars are not won by killing one man.
Furthermore there are clear tactical links between 9/11 and sadaam. Conservatives and republicans and democrats have NOT abandoned those links. Have you seen today's development where Atta was trained in Baghdad by Palestinian master terrorist (like there is any other kind of Palestinian)? And then the terrorist was killed by sadaam to hide evidence? There are documents saying this....
If you had not deliberately put your own eyes out, motivated by your love of democratic sadaam boot lickers (not an exaggeration - your opinion here was formed by democratic lying hacks), you would be following developments on that front.
I am not a Republican. Card is not a Republican.
Why is it that we both agree? Democrats are Sadaam appeasing traitors, and Bush is doing a great service to our country.
[This seemed to piss off ObT]
I have no problem with all the Arab's being terrorists. If the angel Gabriel came down from the sky and said, "ObT, God has decided to make you an offer. He will turn everyone who stole money [ObT is referring to the CEOs - he thinks a CEO can "steal money" from his own company] from the corporations that are the very bones of American Capitalism into a pillar of salt, but if He does it, he will also double the number of Arabs in the world and give them the Bomb" I would say, "Thank You God! Can you give them 2 Bombs and get rid of the insurance companies also?"
I know who my enemies are. It is evident when I write out my checks to pay my bills. Arabs never did anything worse to me than Jews or Christians did. For every terrorism victim, 100 people will die because the Christian Government banned guns they could have used to protect themselves, banned them from combining to get bargaining power in buying cheaper drugs, taxed their big safe SUVs to make them drive small, dangerous rice-mobiles, etc.
My enemies are COMMIES, pure and simple. Arabs are way too disorganized to be Commies, they are just tribesmen who hate us like the Indians did, and their primary purpose is to provide stereotypical bad guys for movies (just like the Indians used to, but now the Indians are stereotypical good guys, WTF? but that's another issue).
The Democratic Sadaam boot lickers are just as commie as Bush. You and Orson Scott Card both agree because you are both COMMIES. Republicans and Democrats are like Stalin and Tito -- both commies, but in disagreement over who gets to be the biggest commie. Terrorism is the capitalist boogey man, that you shout about while robbing and driving your nation into the condition of Albania.
At this point I started crying. Truly my idea of loving W and not stabbing him was deviant and was shown to be monstrous by Osama bin Texan. I must pay penance for my moral crime and try to live the moral life again.
I humbly apologize to everyone.
BTW, The interesting role reversal of the Indians is described here.
Wednesday, December 17, 2003
Here is a musically talented unstabbed commie who thinks he is being patriotic and funny by making fun of W. The flash presentation is called "The Idiot Son of an Asshole". Please listen. It's very catchy.
This, of course, is an attack on America and its values. People that can't respect the will of 100's of millions of people in electing W president, people who call those people who voted for W idiots and assholes for no reason, need to be stabbed. If you've got something to say, say it with your knife and I'll say it with mine. Remember, the free speech nonsense only protects you if they can see you, and if the judges are on your side. As Hannibal Lecter says "Whenever feasible, one must eat the rude". Hold on while I comfort myself with my knife and my other knife.
I see I'm not the first person to stab this commie.
In this very entertaining metafilter thread, we learn that wrongies find it unbelievable that, to a man dealing with strategic threats, the ability to instantly acquire a capability is the same as having the capability.
We also learn that Bush is
"...generally untouchable. The man is generally understood to be utterly stupid and so his statements are held to different standards of validity testing.".
Interesting, Interesting. So interesting that I will get my knife. My very sharp knife. I'm practicing my stabbing motions as I go to get it. Oh look! It's right here!.... I wonder whatever shall I do now???
In other news, one of my favorite science fiction writers, Orson Scott Card, a democrat, explains in a clear and straightforward manner that democrats are traitors:
But then I watch the steady campaign of the national news media to try to win this for the Democrats, and I wonder. Could this insane, self-destructive, extremist-dominated party actually win the presidency? It might--because the media are trying as hard as they can to pound home the message that the Bush presidency is a failure--even though by every rational measure it is not.
And the most vile part of this campaign against Mr. Bush is that the terrorist war is being used as a tool to try to defeat him--which means that if Mr. Bush does not win, we will certainly lose the war. Indeed, the anti-Bush campaign threatens to undermine our war effort, give encouragement to our enemies, and cost American lives during the long year of campaigning that lies ahead of us.
Osama bin Laden's military strategy is: If you make a war cost enough, Americans will give up and go home. Now, bin Laden isn't actually all that bright; his campaign to make us go home is in fact what brought us into Afghanistan and Iraq. But he's still telling his followers: Keep killing Americans and eventually, antigovernment factions within the United States will choose to give up the struggle.
It's what happened in Somalia, isn't it? And it's what happened in Vietnam, too.
Am I saying that critics of the war aren't patriotic?
Not at all--I'm a critic of some aspects of the war. What I'm saying is that those who try to paint the bleakest, most anti-American, and most anti-Bush picture of the war, whose purpose is not criticism but deception in order to gain temporary political advantage, those people are indeed not patriotic. They have placed their own or their party's political gain ahead of the national struggle to destroy the power base of the terrorists who attacked Americans abroad and on American soil.
Patriots place their loyalty to their country in time of war ahead of their personal and party ambitions. And they can wrap themselves in the flag and say they "support our troops" all they like--but it doesn't change the fact that their program is to promote our defeat at the hands of our enemies for their temporary political advantage.
Think what it will mean if we elect a Democratic candidate who has committed himself to an antiwar posture in order to get his party's nomination.
We are being lied to and "spun," and not in a trivial way. The kind of dishonest vitriolic hate campaign that in 2000 was conducted only before black audiences is now being played on the national stage; and the national media, instead of holding the liars' and haters' feet to the fire (as they do when the liars and haters are Republicans or conservatives), are cooperating in building up a false image of a failing economy and a lost war, when the truth is more nearly the exact opposite.
And in all the campaign rhetoric, I keep looking, as a Democrat, for a single candidate who is actually offering a significant improvement over the Republican policies that in fact don't work, while supporting or improving upon the American policies that will help make us and our children secure against terrorists.
We have enemies that have earned our hatred, and whom we should fear. They are fanatical terrorists who seek opportunities to kill American civilians here and Israeli civilians in Israel. But right now, our national media and the Democratic Party are trying to get us to believe that the people we should hate and fear are George W. Bush and the Republicans.
I can think of many, many reasons why the Republicans should not control both houses of Congress and the White House. But right now, if the alternative is the Democratic Party as led in Congress and as exemplified by the current candidates for the Democratic nomination, then I can't be the only Democrat who will, with great reluctance, vote not just for George W. Bush, but also for every other candidate of the only party that seems committed to fighting abroad to destroy the enemies that seek to kill us and our friends at home.
And if we elect a government that subverts or weakens or ends our war against terrorism, we can count on this: We will soon face enemies that will make 9/11 look like stubbing our toe, and they will attack us with the confidence and determination that come from knowing that we don't have the will to sustain a war all the way to the end.
I feel slightly less mad. I'll keep my quota at 327,456 stabbings today. I was going to double it. Be sure to read the comments to his article.
I stumbled on another really entertaining article in FrontPage titled "College Film Festival: Kill the Jews". Half way through, I found myself having such great fun reading it, that I looked to see the author. It was Tatiana Menaker! Remember - that Tatiana!
Here are a couple of choice quotes:
Watching these films, I saw that Palestinian Arabs have become professional victims and actors in the "Israelis-and-Jews-Are-Horrible-Child-Murderers" series. These films are constantly shown in Europe and especially in the Middle East due to heavy demand and plentiful funding. Many years ago one famous writer said that Europe would never forgive Jews for what it did to them during the Holocaust. For Europeans, the image of a bad Israel is a relief from their Holocaust guilt complex, if indeed they ever had one.
Considering that Israel has more computers per capita than the US, it is no wonder that "humiliation" is the second most repeated word in these films. When your people are staring into a donkey's ass while other people across the street are looking at a computer screen, it is a humiliation.
The tragedy of Palestinian Arabs is that they are forced to compare themselves with the superbly developed civilization of Israel instead of, for example, the outskirts of Cairo, where barely dressed, malnourished, unschooled children with rotten teeth are crawling in the dust around mud huts with no sewage system.
And what exactly do they mean by the "Liberation of Palestine"? It's Israel they're talking about. To liberate Palestine you need to exterminate five million Jews. So is this what SFSU students are struggling for? Do you remember that it was anti-Semitic propaganda and anti-Jewish riots in German universities that actually triggered the beginning of the Holocaust?
[Bad Commie: Heh. I guess they don't, Tatiana! ]
The late KGB Chief Yuri Andropov once said: "We won the war in Vietnam on the streets of Washington." The Arab Palestinian movement was created by the KGB. I know: I worked with Arabs back in Russia. They are using the same KGB-taught propaganda strategy that was used in organizing protests against the Vietnam War, which seduced childish professors together with their immature students. Unfortunately, our civilization is losing a war on its university campuses once again.
Indeed, Indeed! Also, read the comments if you have time.
Hey Tatiana, I got a great idea! Print out and drop these leaflets at your next adventure!
P.S. Is this a clip of Harry Truman talking about Joe McCarthy???
Tuesday, December 16, 2003
In keeping with my new status as "angry" Bad Commie, today's entry will have extra stabbing.
First, please, please listen to this short interview [link via hippercritical]. Also, this is a great Iraqi stabbing of a little dirty hippy commie.
So, what is the first thing the Iraqi UN representative says when he gets to the UN?
"One year ago, the Security Council was divided between those who wanted to appease Saddam Hussein and those who wanted to hold him accountable," Zebari told the 15-nation council, which was sharply divided over the war.
"The UN as an organisation failed to help rescue the Iraqi people from a murderous tyranny of 35 years," he said. "The UN must not fail the Iraqi people again."
FuckFrance.com adds: "today we are unearthing thousands of victims in horrifying testament to that failure."
Could that be any plainer for the drooling mongoloid unstabbed commie Kofi Annan? I guess not. Kofi says:
"I think the UN has done as much as it can for Iraq," Annan told reporters. "So quite honestly I don't think today is the time to hurl accusations."
"no time to pin blame and point fingers"
No, Kofi, you are right. We won't be pointing fingers. We'll be stabbing the appeasers and lackeys of mass murderers.
Commisar still seems to have a fixation on dentistry. Maybe UN should join the American Dental Association? It certainly seems to get results for the pentagon. In any case, a vigorous cold temperature stabbing will sort out the situation.
Allah, seems to be stuck on bias in the media.
Jessica is wondering why the Vatican likes Sadaam so much. Maybe the monthly boy shipment fell through, hmmm? My knife shipment got here just fine.
Mr Green (in the study with the big knife I hope?) seems to be mad at wrongies again:
Attention Lunatic Lefties:
A laurel and hearty handshake to the first one of you who says words to the effect of, "Well, it doesn't really matter. HallibuHitlerBush will just have to create a new bogeyman to justify his daddy's buddies lining their pockets with the blood money paid for with the lives of oppressed minority servicepersons and it's all about the oiiiiiiiiiiiiil and the conservative media laps it all right up and the lying liar stole the election and my tinfoil hat is too itchy and..."
And all the Iraqi bloggers are advocating various unsavory methods of disposing of Sadaam's bloated corpse.
In other news, Capitalism mag is cheapening out again. Too cheap to even pay for a bullet for Sadaam:
Since stoning people to death is a tradition in parts of the Middle East, that might be the most appropriate way to execute Saddam Hussein.
If each relative of someone murdered by Saddam were allowed to throw a stone, the line might stretch back for miles. Television pictures of that line, broadcast throughout the Arab world, could completely undermine any notion that this is just an American vendetta against Moslems.
Sorry, too angry at unstabbed commies to have original content today.
Monday, December 15, 2003
Why are these people happy?
Hey, I have a question. If you are not happy, does that make you an asshole?
Some more great pics here.
Summary of Iraqi Blogger opinion here. Contrast that with the smug dickheads populating the rest of the world. We need to trot Sadaam out and have him sell their daughters to Egyptian nightclubs. And then we need to let Sadaam beat them to death. Then maybe they will see the benefit of Iraqi and American justice.
I'm not holding my breath.
Sunday, December 14, 2003
Stalin's copycat, Sadaam, meets Stalin's fate today. French, German, and Democrat leaders everywhere are busy trying to say that their willing mob followers are happy about this. Liars.
Some examples of cognitive dissonance:
French Television is in public mourning, having not yet gotten the new marching orders from the top to fake happiness:
UPDATE: As this news is being confirmed with each passing minute, the news announcer on LCI (French 24 hour news channel subsidiary of TF1) looks like he's in mourning.
UPDATE: The broad now presenting the news on LCI asks, 'How could they catch Saddam Hussein, the Americans were having enormous intelligence problems in Iraq?'. Yeah, enormous problems, according to America's French 'friends'. Just afterwards she switched to Paul Bremer's press conference where he stated 'We got 'im!'.
Chinese Official newspapers initially phrase capture as "one more probable lie of imperialist dogs".
Palestinians crying in the streets of Gaza that their benefactor is about to get it (ok, that's not really dissonance)
I'm sure the Germans are crying with distress.
Here is a page the BBC made, so we can all look at how disturbed the commies are by this. Samples of unstabbed commies:
I'm a bit sad that it puts an end to this battle of David against Goliath. We must acknowledge that Saddam Hussein is a cunning, if not a talented leader. He may look defeated, tired, dejected but when you think of all the means deployed to get rid of him, it's just a tremendous achievement to have been able to survive.
Bernard Franck Dehlinger, Ris-Orangis, France
I am very sorry to hear the news. I believe that he was the leader of not only the Iraqi people but also the Muslim people against the USA.
Iqbal Chowdhury, Dhaka, Bangladesh
It sounds more fantastic than one may think for a person of Saddam Hussein's military strength to be arrested in a simple way like that expressed by Paul Bremer. It is not my intention to negate the news but one has to approach it with caution.
Angelo J, Dar-Es-Salaam, Tanzania
Although Hussein's capture is wonderful news for the Iraqi people, it still does not provide justification for this war and my country's continued Empire building throughout the world - most recently through the seizure of Iraq's oil. Bush has finished what his Daddy started and I'm sure the family will be especially grateful to their Good Lord at this Christmas.
Robert Lattanzi, New York, USA
I was happy to learn that Hussein was captured, certainly good news from a human rights point of view. But, I am left wondering - does the end justify the means? Does this mean that the US should wage war with every other horrible dictatorship around the world in the name of freedom, democracy, and peace?
Lori Wilson, Washington, DC, US
Saddam's trial may well be a mixed blessing for the US. He will undoubtedly (and embarrassingly) reveal how he was helped to power and supplied with WMD by the US government. And if the WMD still fail to turn up, the grounds and legality for the war will be clearly be in doubt.
Trevor Davis, Guildford, UK
'Freedom loving people' have short memories! This 'fantastic news' is just that for Bush and Blair but not so much for the Iraqi people who suffered at his hands - with the full support of the West. This was is not being done to bring freedom to people; it's being dome to impose neo-liberal capitalism! Wake up, guys!
"Ladies and Gentlemen, WE got him" Possibly the worst, most crass and counter-productive way to announce joyous news. It sends out the wrong message about America and the coalition to the world, especially the Arab world.
Adam Stimson, Sheffield, UK
Funny how Saddam Hussein appears in the news just when both the American and British Governments are struggling to gather support for their respective 'Presidential' campaigns. This fantastic piece of detective work has the same smell as the reason the war was 'inaugurated'.
David, Rome, Italy
This is the first action in Iraq since the first Iraq war which will make a real positive difference to the Iraqi people. Saddam's capture removes the threat of reprisal from the old regime and will allow Iraqis to concentrate on rebuilding their country. The US now has the huge responsibility of ensuring that the rebuilding of Iraq will be just, fair and peaceful for all the people of Iraq.
John M, Lyne Meads, UK
The capture of Saddam might be enough to bring peace, but we must stay serious as there is a chance that the attacks might just get worse, but for now the world has one less tyrant, it is time to capture Osama.
Christopher, New York City, United States
On one hand, I'm relieved that this tyrant is in custody and I hope that he will be put to a fair trial. On the other hand, I worry about the momentum this will give the Bush administration and the whitewashing effect this may have on US consciousness about the validity war in Iraq.
Kate O'Neill, Nashville, TN, USA
After the 'celebrations' have dies down, I hope everyone asks themselves what this really means for Iraq, and indeed the west. Will Saddam be given fair justice, by Iraqis or be given the US' version of justice? Does this mean a solid and reliable government can be allowed to form in Iraq and the US can withdraw? And if linked to war the war on terror, does this mean terrorism will stop. I fear not, because this incident has nothing to do with stopping the seeds of terrorism which are still being planted by the very false war.
It's good that it's clarified where Saddam Hussein is now. But I do not hope that people forget now that George W. Bush has lead the world into a war without proof of WMD and a connection to Osama bin Laden. What Bush did was wrong. And Americans need to remember that next year when the presidential elections take place.
Michelle Mauriere, Leipzig, Germany
[I just stabbed my computer.
This is what we need to do to these Germans:
I don't see the arrest of Saddam Hussein making any difference to the coalition's problems in Iraq. This establishes Bin Laden as the world's No1 terrorist, and I suspect that the Iraqi dissidents will now turn to him to organise their campaigns against the coalition forces, if they have not done so already. All that will be derived from this is a couple of days good PR for Bush and Blair.
Frank Redmond, London, UK
Compare that with the non commies in the same thread.
Commisar of the Politburo Diktat is his funny self:
Imperialists Score One
So Militaristic Hegemons have captured glorious Comrade Saddam.
Great man had grown beard. Had $750,000. Hiding in hole in house near Tikrit.
Ungrateful Iraqi people on FAUX News now. Firing Kalshnikovs in air. Dancing in street. What? They think maybe Sears Tower has been attacked?
Torture! They torture Comrade Saddam! On TV. Evil Amerikan solider put massive piece of wood in mouth. Make him say "Ah.'
Religious comrades may say prayer for Saddam, and for Howard Dean.
The anti American, but thorough web site http://www.iraqdaily.net for some unfathomable reason had linked to an article about Howard Dean (saying: "Dean's candidacy inspires shock, awe") right before the Sadaam news broke! Howard Dean! This is a web site that has only middle eastern anti-American slanted news and almost never links to anything American.
How do you like real shock and awe, commies?
Is this delicious irony at work? Is God somewhere laughing his ass off? I think he is. Look what you did my brave American soldiers, you made the drooling mongoloid laugh and me cry for your dedication and bravery.
More great funnies in this fark thread.
In other delicious irony, this news comes one day after the zeropeons publicly fail to agree on a constitution because old europe didn't want to give equal power to new europe. So called "Europe" collapses while America stands tall and brave.
Think hard my readers. Who's political fortunes have just been dashed? Who was the communist anti-american anti-freedom asshole? Who was on who's side? Who has lost because mass murdering commies have been overthrown?
Saturday, December 13, 2003
I have a question for you, readers. Is money the same thing as speech? Is money "free" speech? Is money free? Are cars free? Are houses free? Is air free? Is stealing free?
Here in the United Soviet Socialist Republic of America (best place on earth!), Money Is King. Therefore, if money wants to rape women, run for president as a democrat, or beat its slaves - we let money do whatever the hell kingly thing it wants to do. This great "American" idea we have of worshipping money leads to the full realization of the ideas of Bertrand Russell
The British philosopher Bertrand Russell once quipped that philosophy was the art of starting from premises too trivial for anyone to contest and arriving at conclusions too outlandish for anyone to accept. Had he lived to see the Supreme Court's recent ruling upholding core provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, he might have said something similar about jurisprudence, if not for the fact that so many people seem perfectly eager to accept the outlandish conclusions.
I therefore propose a solution that would, I hope, make Bertrand Russell proud. We must close the First Amendment loophole once and for all, and recognize that constitutional protection of "free expression" should be reserved for copies of Hustler, as the Founders intended, not extended to such dangerous frivolities as the expression of political views.
I would have it no other way. Now shut up, readers. Oh, that's right, I'm the one talking! Good.
Speaking of money, is it our only hope that the honest French decide to buy Enron and WorldCom also ? Because if the only criminals that get punished are French, I may have to support giving the French those reconstruction contracts after all. Oh, but its W that made the French pay up. Heh. W is a good bill collector. Those frenchie CEOs must have been peeing in their pants. But, you know, he only takes the "compassionate conservative" or "moral" cases.
But democrats aren't any better. The only kind of bill collecting they do is to collect the "still somewhat voluntary" contributions the "misguided voter" makes for their presidential campaigns. BTW, if democrats are so democratic why is their average contribution size so much larger than that of republicans? I.E. why do republicans have a lot of poor people contributing just a little money? You don't see this absolute proof of democratic elitism show up on page 1 of the NYT, do you?. Just like you don't see squat about Bush being pro-environment, IRAQIs hating dictators, or the peace loving Germans raping and killing for the sake of Anti-Americanism and other similar forms of peace, common good, and spirituality. I bet you the German Anti-America protestors have this for their headquarters.
P.S. U.S.S.R.A. still has plenty of slavery. It's just called different names now. Whatever you do, don't show a plantation owner that you are good at picking cotton. Oops, I mean "private for profit" "prison" owner, not plantation owner. How could I possibly have gotten confused? Oh that's right, because, in either case, innocent niggers are being whipped and chained by the white man for economic gain (economic gain is crack allowance money for the sons and daughters of rich Hollywood movie stars).
Thursday, December 11, 2003
Comrades, The New Jew Times is at it again. They are accusing Republicans and Howard Dean of committing the most horrible liberal crime ever - of both being Joe McCarthy. But they don't want to do it directly, because this crime of being McCarthy is so horrible (as opposed to, say, being Stalin or Sadaam), so instead they put words in the mouths of republicans:
Republican inside and outside the campaign are studying parallels between Dr. Dean's candidacy and other insurgent campaigns, including those of Senator Eugene McCarthy in 1968 and of Senator John McCain of Arizona, who nearly derailed Mr. Bush's march to the Republican nomination in 2000.
Interesting, Interesting.... So Republicans say Dean is like McCarthy? Republicans "insult Dean horribly". Hmmmm.....
However there is also the implication that Dean is actually McCarthy (since he is not the annointed chosen of the democratic north eastern elite commies - that's John "I'm a French idiot" Kerry). Interesting, Interesting.
Of-course, I am very confused by all this. As you know, Joe McCarthy was 100% correct about the state department being full of commie fascists. However, McCarthy, like Commie Spy Ann Coulter, was also a no good loud mouthed commie, because he couldn't even be bothered to go and shoot people whom he called traitors. All he could do is get some communist very powerful democrat senators unelected, which no one cares about except the democrats. The democrats never forgave him the great blow he dealt them and continued to erroneously slander him for the next 50 years.
I don't want anyone to get the idea that I am pro Dean, so here is another delicious attack on him:
The extreme Left has made a terrible strategic mistake shacking up with the Islamists. In one sense, they're not as incompatible as they might appear: Islamism may be religious in origin but in its political form it is simply this decade's brand of oppressive statism, as communism was before it. But the only question now is how deeply this strategic error infects the less insane Left. On National Public Radio the other day, Howard Dean advanced the theory that the Saudis had tipped off Bush about 9/11 in advance. When the Democratic presidential front-runner is cheerfully wearing his tinfoil hat in public, it's no wonder the other fellows are scrambling to sound just as loopy.
Heh. "Cheerfully wearing tin foil hat". Heh. Aren't they the least bit worried that this is a trick by Howard Dean to take control of the Dungeons and Dragons vote? Hmmm? Maybe the South Park Republican vote?
Actually with all this talk of republicans and democrats being bi-commie commie fascists, some of you may have gotten the idea that I am a libertarian. I admit, anarcho-capitalism does hold some appeal, but not much. Not when you have arguments like this marshaled against you:
All property, indeed, except the savage's temporary cabin, his bow, his matchcoat and other little Acquisitions absolutely necessary for his Subsistence, seems to me to be the creature of public Convention. Hence, the public has the rights of regulating Descents, and all other Conveyances of Property, and even of limiting the quantity and uses of it. All the property that is necessary to a man is his natural Right, which none may justly deprive him of, but all Property superfluous to such Purposes is the property of the Public who, by their Laws have created it and who may, by other Laws dispose of it.
... As long as you continue to tar social democracy with all the crimes of communism, I feel equally entitled to tar the free market with the crimes of slavery, segregation, colonialism and genocide; piss me off and I'll add fascism and the Nazis.
How noble libertarianism, in its majestic equality, that both rich and poor are equally prohibited from peeing in the privately owned streets (without paying), sleeping under the privately owned bridges (without paying), and coercing bread from its rightful owners!
Mike Huben, paraphrasing Anatole France
Now, the Libertarian Party, is a *capitalist* party. It's in favor of what *I* would regard a *particular form* of authoritarian control. Namely, the kind that comes through private ownership and control, which is an *extremely* rigid system of domination -- people have to... people can survive, by renting themselves to it, and basically in no other way... I do disagree with them *very* sharply, and I think that they are not..understanding the *fundamental* doctrine, that you should be free from domination and control, including the control of the manager and the owner.
There isn't much point arguing about the word "libertarian." It would make about as much sense to argue with an unreconstructed Stalinist about the word "democracy" -- recall that they called what they'd constructed "peoples' democracies." The weird offshoot of ultra-right individualist anarchism that is called "libertarian" here happens to amount to advocacy of perhaps the worst kind of imaginable tyranny, namely unaccountable private tyranny. If they want to call that "libertarian," fine; after all, Stalin called his system "democratic." But why bother arguing about it?
An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup.
H. L. Mencken
Anarcho-capitalists forget their own Austrian economics. It was Von Mises who described the marketplace as the ultimate democracy, where "sovereign consumers voted with their dollars" to fulfill their desires. Not necessarily good desires, mind you: just "desires." Whatever they happened to be. The market was itself amoral: it simply satisfied the desires of the greatest number. (That's why Howard Stern sells better than Isaac Stern.)
[Libertarians] don't denounce what the state does, they just object to who's doing it. This is why the people most victimized by the state display the least interest in libertarianism. Those on the receiving end of coercion don't quibble over their coercers' credentials. If you can't pay or don't want to, you don't much care if your deprivation is called larceny or taxation or restitution or rent. If you like to control your own time, you distinguish employment from enslavement only in degree and duration.
Bob Black, The Libertarian As Conservative, 1984
Yes, that's right. The commie poop is melting quite nicely.
Wednesday, December 10, 2003
It's commie fighting time! Looks like fascist democratic socialists (i.e. college students soon to work in McDonalds) are oppressing fascist communist republicans:
On November 7th, the Wells Republicans issued a press release describing the study they had conducted of the political party registrations of the members of the social sciences and humanities faculties at the college. The study revealed that members of parties of the Left (Democrats, Greens, Working Families) outnumbered Republicans by a ratio of 92 percent to 8 percent.
A Wells professor responded to the study calling Republicans "stupid" and calling for Republicans to be forcibly lobotomized
Said Wells Republican Treasurer Colleen Curry, a sophomore from Warren, Maine: "There seems to be a pattern emerging. Wells speaks often and loudly of its devotion to diversity. But when it comes to hiring faculty, somehow there is a glaring absence of conservatives. And when the few conservative students on campus want to organize themselves into a club, they are denied recognition."
Hochenberger added, "We will seek to appeal this decision if possible, and bring it to the attention of the college's administration, including Wells College President Lisa Marsh Ryerson. But sadly, we members of the Republican club, and other students sympathetic to our cause, are coming to the conclusion that Wells College's culture is hostile to traditional students."
Well, what do you expect? Was there some kind of philosophical reason why democratic fascists would not oppress republican ones? There must be a fight for power among the fascists. As we all know, Stalin did not tolerate Lenin and Trotsky for long.
In the comments at a follow up article, a wise reader says:
Date: 11/10/2003 8:09:46 AM
Subject: Happy Kristall Nacht
First, they get everyone to believe all their problems are the fault a minority that has all the power (Even though they can do nothing without the permission of the majority). Then, the majority spreads the word, for all to hear, that the small group deserves to be punished, segregated or eliminated. Then a hate filled segment of the majority speaks out, that since they are the ones with the support of the people, no one will stop them when they go after this terrible minority.
Sieg Heil! Liberal Academia Uber Alles!
P.S. Hitler was a Socialist too.
Yes he was. Yes he was.
In other news, I'm no fan of George Soros, the guy who is donating 10's of millions of dollars to keep bush from getting re-elected, but this is highly amusing:
But now, Slavic autocrats have been joined in red-faced George-bashing by two new overlapping groups: American conservatives, and hawkish friends of Israel. Ever since Soros began ladling out millions to the dump-Bush campaign, while larding his anti-administration rhetoric with inflammatory comparisons to Nazi Germany and Yasser Arafat, it has been open season on Open Society. Thus we now have the spectacle of one of the world's most active and influential anti-communists (not to mention one of its most successful capitalists) being tarred as a particularly dangerous friend of Marx and Lenin.
Don't all these idiots that try to call each other commies have any idea of what a commie is? Or are they just suffering from massive cognitive dissonance? Or just plain lying?
At least the Iraqis must know who the commies are, right? No, they are busy staging massive demonstrations against terrorism. I guess they are demonstrating against themselves, unless there is some subtlety of the Islam religion and the misdirected Jew hate that I missed? Check out this flag the demostrators are carrying.
Actually I think Russian style communism is much better than Jew hate and the oppression of women along with mindless killing and many other immoral acts(i.e. Islam), but either way, they should get stabbed.
Does president, chief commie, Bush, know who the commies are? No, he's too busy making sure American tax payer money doesn't go to American tax payers, or countries that can achieve results with it efficiently. Why don't we just rebuild IRAQ by pointing a gun at an IRAQI and telling him to build or die? Oh alright, maybe that's kind of ineffective. See, that's why I'm not president. Because I think American money should go to American tax payers directly.
Sunday, December 07, 2003
Why are people such liars?
I really do not understand how parents (or anyone else for that matter) can feel that it's right to systematically lie to their children for years, assuming they'll just figure it all out later when they get older. Santa Claus... the Easter Bunny... the Tooth Fairy... why is it alright to lie to children about these things but not others? How can parents expect their children to trust them once they're caught in the lie? I was about 6 or 7 when I stopped believing in Santa Claus and his ilk, and kept pestering my mother until she finally admitted that they were make-believe. Then I asked her what else she was lying to me about. Oddly enough, our relationship went downhill from there.
Comrades, what do you think the chance is of adults being any different? Here is a situation where adults lie to kids for the sake of entertaining the adults, and to keep the little buggers quiet. And this is your own child we are talking about! What would these very same adults do to another adult that they had no reason to like? Would they tell them some fairy tale about Christmas Lenin and the Three Wise Stalins? And how money needed to be donated for the common good (where they would be in charge of distributing the money and drawing a salary for their "good work")?
You already know my low opinion of doctors. Doctors who don't actually heal people, but instead prescribe drugs precisely in such a way so the patient can not later sue them. Doctors need to be looking at the root causes of things, not prescribing broad spectrum antibiotics drugs to cure random symptoms. Doctors need to step up and be responsible for the health of their community and of their patients, and they need to be punished if they fail at their responsibility. If a doctor tries to make 300,000 dollars a year, we need to execute him. Being a doctor is inherently being a personal communist who gives away all he has. Rich doctors with Ferraris should be avoided like the plague.
Lets take the case of social workers. No one is stupid enough to be mad at social workers, right? Well, Bad Commie is. These people say they help others, and that you should give them money in order that they can help others. So, lets see, region adjusted comfortable salary ($40,000) plus some money to help the homeless and abused ($60,000). Hmm, why am I being robbed to the tune of $100,000 by this helper again? Why doesn't this helper instead learn some useful skills, earn $120,000 dollars a year for honest work, and then donate 80% of their salary directly to people who are not well off in their local community? Instead, we have these useless maggots, walking around and telling everyone how useful they are and how you must give them money. Yes, we know you want to pretend to be a good person by helping people. But if you can't even help yourself, how can we trust you?
Here is what social workers really are:
My sister-in-law is an otherwise responsible psychiatric social worker in San Diego; but when Bush visited San Diego after the fires and one of her patients made mention of the fact, my sister-in-law expressed the hope that his plane crash.
Never mind that lots of other people would be killed if that happened. Never mind that she's saying this to one of her patients - an action that, IMHO, is utterly unprofessional. Never mind any of this stuff: this otherwise sane person is so screwed up in the head that she would dance in the streets if GWB bought the farm: much as other liberals of my acquaintance celebrated when Reagan was shot.
I wonder how come she didn't go over to Iraq so Sadaam could calm down by "abusing" her?
Enough of this doctors, social workers, "health" insurance (a blatantly incorrect name) crap.
Here is the story of someone who came to the united states to escape communism. Communism under which Tatiana Menaker had suffered and lost [links courtesy of Alan K. Henderson's Weblog and the Politburo Diktat]:
Imagine the utter amazement of a refugee from a Communist country, where Marxism was forced on all students, now having to sink in a puddle of socialist propaganda again -- but this time in the middle of an American university!
Imagine the astonishment of a person who, after fighting the KGB and being a refusenik, finally comes so close to her dream of receiving a real education instead of indoctrination, only to find herself, once again, in the middle of a socialist brainwashing machine -- but this time in San Francisco.
Obviously, being busy with teaching and promoting world change, these professors have overlooked the well-known fact that Marxist ideology failed the test in every country where it was applied. Completely unchastened by the failure of socialism, these individuals still harbor the dream of a Union of American Socialist Republics. It is not my duty to enlighten them about the events of modern history or to correct their outdated '60s-era radical political views. But unfortunately, their obsession affects their job performance and ruins education systems all across the county.
Last summer, one of my professors started every class with Orwellian "Five-Minute Hate" condemnations of President Bush. The instructor did not understand how ridiculous he looked: a 50-year-old guy in sandals and a worn-out jacket with hanging threads, who didn't make it to an Ivy League university, giving hysterical speeches calling President Bush "a moron" and "a good for nothing idiot."
Over time I found the inverse proportion worked as well: the more well-kept and professional the teacher was, and the harder he worked, the less inclined he was to get himself into the mess of quasi-political discussions instead of the work he was paid to do: teach.
This pointed out the major difference between my education in the Soviet Union and my education at SFSU. When I wanted to transfer credits from my Leningrad University degree to SFSU, I was told by the International Admissions Office that it couldn't be done, because as a professor of Marxist-Leninist philosophy, I had only gone through "indoctrination." I find this fascinating, because the difference between Leningrad University and SFSU is that my professors in Leningrad were forced to teach socialist propaganda for fear of brutal punishment; here a bunch of aged hippies, who put students through forced indoctrination instead of academic work, were materially rewarded for their radical activism.
Not only am I as amazed as Alice in the Socialist Wonderland of San Francisco State University, but I feel as though I need to attend a third university to receive a real education. At SFSU, I've merely had my second Marxist indoctrination.
Its these kind of stories that make me for the burning 40% of books and for burning these houses of indocrination known as universities down to the ground.
In other news, why are people in France, a socialist hellhole, more likely to die of violent deaths than in the US where everyone has big scary guns? Huh, communist monkey? Why is that?
I added links to some more blogs on the side.
Friday, December 05, 2003
I found something to take my mind off politics. Check out this drivel from the New York "Pravda":
Hospitals Say They're Penalized by Medicare for Improving Care
"The health care system is perverse," said a frustrated Dr. Brent C. James, who leads Intermountain's efforts to improve quality. "The payments are perverse. It pays us to harm patients, and it punishes us when we don't."
Oh God! Where do I even start. Can it really be? Is it possible that no one reading the New York Communist Times understands that doctors are supposed to help people? That's right. Doctors help patients who, after they are helped, no longer need to go to doctors. At which point the doctor and the CEO can no longer afford payments on the Ferrari. What kind of an intellectual midget would want to pay a doctor for work that a doctor didn't do? What kind of a drooling communist would want doctors to be paid for letting their patient get worse and worse (and therefore require more "treatment" - or assassination, as is the accurate word). Can these flea bitten mongoloid French intellectuals please stab themselves, or do I have to do it, like always? Tell me, where is the unstabbed commie who doesn't understand that, when doctors heal patients, the government should no longer pay doctors money? I say that if a hospital serving the community does not reduce its expenses by 10% every year, then 10% of the doctors need to be executed in public. Why couldn't these so called places of health improve health by 10% a year? Is it maybe because DOCTORS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH CARE?
Just asking, Just asking.
In other non political news, it looks like Japan, the wonder of modern "capitalism", is a police state. Check out this story:
I work as a computer consultant to the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo, and according to embassy officials (who will not go on record), Japan's legal system is rather third world and up to 50% of the Ministry of Justice is touched by Yakuza (mafia). Japanese cops move up in their career when they make "good" arrests and go down-permanently, when they make "wrong" arrests.
Japan has a 99.9% conviction rate, so you can guess how many wrong arrests are turned into "good" arrests by forcing confessions and such.
Heh. So that's why my cell phone says "Workers Unite! Kill the nasty middle class Kulaks!", when I turn it on.
And finally, I just can't resist. Check out this wildly entertaining attack on Howard Dean, courtesy of some republican commies:
Every generation or so, our great Republic manages to give birth to a political figure so obnoxiously certain of his moral and intellectual superiority over the booboisie that we lowly, simple folk eventually begin to heave with nausea. The insufferable Governor Dean is the latest incarnation. Born deep in the heartland of Manhattan's Upper East Side, schooled at only the best of New York's private preparatory institutions before entering the real world of the Ivy League, young Howard spent his summers in the Hamptons. Certainly these early life experiences prepared Mr. Dean to empathize with the average, middle-class American.
Howard Dean's Manhattan-prep school-Hampton-Ivy-Vermont frame of mind is, in fact, a little island of democratic socialist Europe within America. Howard Dean may justly be called the Jacques Chirac of America. Like the slightly overweight Chirac, Dean nearly bursts out of his suit and ties with indignation and outrage over the small mindedness of anyone who can not see the secular, multicultural worldview of himself and fellow progressive-minded intelligentsia. His worldview reminds me of a professor I had at Harvard who would begin each pronouncement of opinion by stating, As we all know The problem was that the rest of the sentence was almost never an obvious fact or given, but rather the ideological assumptions of the Left which were to be taken as unassailable to them as the Nicene Creed to orthodox Christians.
Heh. This is almost as good as Stalin killing Lenin.
This weekend, I plan to explain communism, via a chart with arrows, like this one. Stay Tuned! Get ready for a triple covalent bond between communists and vodka!
Thursday, December 04, 2003
I hate politics. Why do I have to listen to unstabbed commies talking and talking? I tried stabbing my television, but it just showed me a picture of Jesse Jackson giving a speech to commies in Africa. Its like they are taunting me! I, commie, take 50% of your money and you can't do anything about it!
Seems like Harry Binswanger has been seduced by the commie spy Ann Coulter. Stop thinking with your pants, Harry! Harry says:
Not only did she answer this specific charge, she answered every other charge that I could recall from the beginning of Franken's book (which is the part that contains the attack on Coulter). She admits to two tiny mistakes, and notes that they were immediately corrected for subsequent printings. But, basically, she catches Franken out.
The value of Coulter's book (abstracting from its flaws) is not in its concretes, but in the ideas that the concretes illustrate. Yes, Coulter is savage, overstates, ridicules, and sometimes oversimplifies. But she has a mind. Franken does not. She sees the big picture of what's going on in this country. Franken not only doesn't, he twists the picture, as in his denying the leftist bias in the media.
Shame on you Harry! Commies aren't for listening to! They are for stabbing!
At least he knows that Ann isn't acting in his interest:
Let us not forget, however, that the enemy of our enemy is not the same as our friend. The conservatives are as bad a threat--you could argue they're a worse threat, ultimately--as the liberals. It was the ultra-left Pacifica Radio that put Ayn Rand on the air on a regular basis--and this was during the late 60s. And before that, it was Columbia University's radio station, WKCR, that hosted the weekly "Ayn Rand on Campus."
My main problem with commies is that they are alive and unstabbed. Aside from that, they are also always perpetually unhappy. George Orwell wrote an essay asking "Can Socialists be Happy?". George says:
The inability of mankind to imagine happiness except in the form of relief, either from effort or pain, presents Socialists with a serious problem. Dickens can describe a poverty-stricken family tucking into a roast goose, and can make them appear happy; on the other hand, the inhabitants of perfect universes seem to have no spontaneous gaiety and are usually somewhat repulsive into the bargain. But clearly we are not aiming at the kind of world Dickens described, nor, probably, at any world he was capable of imagining. The Socialist objective is not a society where everything comes right in the end, because kind old gentlemen give away turkeys. What are we aiming at, if not a society in which 'charity' would be unnecessary? We want a world where Scrooge, with his dividends, and Tiny Tim, with his tuberculous leg, would both be unthinkable. But does that mean we are aiming at some painless, effortless Utopia? At the risk of saying something which the editors of Tribune may not endorse, I suggest that the real objective of Socialism is not happiness. Happiness hitherto has been a by-product, and for all we know it may always remain so. The real objective of Socialism is human brotherhood. This is widely felt to be the case, though it is not usually said, or not said loudly enough. Men use up their lives in heart-breaking political struggles, or get themselves killed in civil wars, or tortured in the secret prisons of the Gestapo, not in order to establish some central-heated, air-conditioned, strip-lighted Paradise, but because they want a world in which human beings love one another instead of swindling and murdering one another. And they want that world as a first step. Where they go from there is not so certain, and the attempt to foresee it in detail merely confuses the issue.
Socialist thought has to deal in prediction, but only in broad terms. One often has to aim at objectives which one can only very dimly see. At this moment, for instance, the world is at war and wants peace. Yet the world has no experience of peace, and never has had, unless the Noble Savage once existed. The world wants something which it is dimly aware could exist, but cannot accurately define. This Christmas Day, thousands of men will be bleeding to death in the Russian snows, or drowning in icy waters, or blowing one another to pieces on swampy islands of the Pacific; homeless children will be scrabbling for food among the wreckage of German cities. To make that kind of thing impossible is a good objective. But to say in detail what a peaceful world would be like is a different matter.
Nearly all creators of Utopia have resembled the man who has toothache, and therefore thinks happiness consists in not having toothache. They wanted to produce a perfect society by an endless continuation of something that had only been valuable because it was temporary. The wider course would be to say that there are certain lines along which humanity must move, the grand strategy is mapped out, but detailed prophecy is not our business. Whoever tries to imagine perfection simply reveals his own emptiness. This is the case even with a great writer like Swift, who can flay a bishop or a politician so neatly, but who, when he tries to create a superman, merely leaves one with the impression the very last he can have intended that the stinking Yahoos had in them more possibility of development than the enlightened Houyhnhnms.
Hmmm. I don't know if I should listen to George. After all, he was the one that said "War is Peace", "Slavery is Freedom". Now, he was probably just kidding, but I have a very low tolerance for communist statements like that. It's safer just to stab him and read whatever he wrote later. [Someone just informed we the George was already stabbed - Good. Now we don't have to worry about him being a commie]. At least I know the answer to his question. Of-course, the only happy socialist is a stabbed one. Its so obvious. Why didn't he see that?
Moving On, Evidently I have some fans over in the Howard Dean Forum! Hi Fans! I have to warn you though, I'm not about to not stab commies just because they are nice people! Besides, maybe they just like me for my knives?
Also, Mao, is visiting the heartland today:
The number three man in the Chinese government will pay his first visit to Boston next week, underscoring the growing commercial ties between the Bay State and the world's most populous nation.
Evidently, Liberty Mutual is sponsoring it. An insurance company! Grrrr. Don't get me started on insurance companies.
I tried to buy insurance from communism once, but they wouldn't sell it to me - mumbled something about how they didn't want to stab themselves.
Tuesday, December 02, 2003
Looks like the commie republican John McCain was forced to apologize for his remarks about the republican congress spending money like a drunken sailor:
(2003-12-01) -- An embarrassed Senator John McCain, R-AZ, today apologized to members of the U.S. Navy's version of Alcoholics Anonymous for comparing Congressional spending to that of "a drunken sailor."
"It was a mean, insensitive remark," said Mr. McCain. "A drunken sailor could never spend as much money as Congress has, with that kind of speed. My analogy was also wrong because a drunken sailor usually spends his own paycheck."
In related news, Mr. McCain, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, said he hopes that Americans enjoy the pre-Christmas shopping season.
"Everyone should get out to the stores and malls and spend money like an incumbent legislator," he said.
Heh. Looks like unstabbed commies have a sense of humor.
I also found a very entertaining post on an IRAQI blog today:
Well I found that the answer is so simple, that even a blind man can see...heh.
I have read some statistics about the economy of the USA and I found that the (GDP) of America is something around (11,000 billion) dollars, while that of Iraq is about (18 billion) dollars (regarding the current rate of oil export), which means that the (GDP) of USA = 611 times the (GDP) of Iraq.
Another interesting result is that America can make that (18) billions in only 14 hours!.
Everyone knows that the American forces need about (4 billion) dollars/month for their supplies, operations and reconstruction work.
I find it so naive for someone to think that the USA is spending 4 billions a month to "steal" 1,5 billions.
The USA has already spent (or assigned) over 200 billion dollars, which requires the Americans to wait for over 10 years to get their money back.
What a great investment!!!
And that's only in the case that America is "stealing" all the oil or money of Iraq, while as a matter of fact, all the money that oil yields is spent to provide food, medications and of course to pay salaries to the Iraqis.
The war was never for oil itself, the aims of the war were freeing the Iraqi people, destroying Saddam's WMD's, fighting international terrorism and the spread of freedom and democracy in the M.E.
So all it takes to "teach" Arabs how to divide is to invade their country and do inspections for 6 months? Interesting. Oh, well. I hope someone "teaches" the French math soon.
The whole GDP thing is a fraud though, as the excellent Howard Katz says:
One of the interventions adopted by the Democratic Party in the 1930s was for the government to give the bankers the privilege to create money. This allowed the bankers to gain unearned wealth - at the expense of the working man and the retired. The bankers immediately corrupted the economics profession by inducing academia to give prestigious positions to "economists" favorable to their interests. These banker economists invented a new measure of the American economy - gross domestic product - which counted the waste caused by the banker activity as wealth. The American media - which would never question authority - accepted GDP as being equivalent to the U.S. economy. Today as GDP rises, the average American finds it more and more difficult to own a home; he must work more months to own the average car; he is putting his wife out to work, and he himself is working longer hours. Do not complain Mr. and Mrs. America; the economic establishment has officially declared that you are getting richer. Who are you to question authority?
But you gotta give the IRAQI points for even trying to do the math test!
Here is another entertaining post by an IRAQI who is discovering that everything he sees on TV is lies, whether its Sadaam, the commie Ann Coulter, Fox news, MSNBC, whatever. I am thinking that these IRAQIs will make pretty good trollerers. We should have them debate democrats on tv all the time. I bet you they would kick ass.
Speaking of debating commies, evidently Frank has caugh on to the whole stabbing thing!
Now, the ways conservatives dealt with wacky liberals has progressed a lot throughout the years from the simple beating; later on liberals were stabbed and then, as society advanced, shot.
He seems to think I'm not cool cause I prefer stabbing to shooting. Oh well. At least my knife doesn't run out of bullets!